Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene
The contributions included in this Crossing Boundaries section reflect upon infrastructural temporality, chronopolitics and natural history in relation to the Anthropocene and climate change. Vando Borghi examines infrastructure capitalism and regimes of historicity, arguing that infrastructural syn...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Tecnoscienza |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/21165 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823858057545777152 |
---|---|
author | Vando Borghi Luigi Pellizzoni Paolo Savoia |
author_facet | Vando Borghi Luigi Pellizzoni Paolo Savoia |
author_sort | Vando Borghi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The contributions included in this Crossing Boundaries section reflect upon infrastructural temporality, chronopolitics and natural history in relation to the Anthropocene and climate change. Vando Borghi examines infrastructure capitalism and regimes of historicity, arguing that infrastructural synchronization dispossesses individuals of agency, producing “uncertizenship”. He invites us to delve into “ruins thinking” and an “epistemology of coordination” to inhabit this condition and re-territorialize infrastructures. Luigi Pellizzoni interrogates whether the Anthropocene narrative represents a break from or continuity with late capitalist modernity’s politics of time. Addressing the concept of “non-trivial futures”, he argues that the Anthropocene aligns with and strengthens capitalism’s recursive temporality and secular eschatology, opening space for conservative or reactionary designs. Finally, Paolo Savoia traces a “revival” of natural history in the environmental humanities, enabled by temporal short-circuits between the 16th and 21st centuries. Early modern natural history is revealed as preluding anthropology that blurred nature-culture divides and anticipates a notion of “third nature” which challenges the scalability logic characteristic of modernity. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-829f53e5c8644804b3281e5c55286532 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2038-3460 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | University of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione |
record_format | Article |
series | Tecnoscienza |
spelling | doaj-art-829f53e5c8644804b3281e5c552865322025-02-11T16:26:00ZengUniversity of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e ComunicazioneTecnoscienza2038-34602025-02-0115212515510.6092/issn.2038-3460/2116519542Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the AnthropoceneVando Borghi0Luigi Pellizzoni1Paolo Savoia2University of BolognaScuola Normale SuperioreUniversity of BolognaThe contributions included in this Crossing Boundaries section reflect upon infrastructural temporality, chronopolitics and natural history in relation to the Anthropocene and climate change. Vando Borghi examines infrastructure capitalism and regimes of historicity, arguing that infrastructural synchronization dispossesses individuals of agency, producing “uncertizenship”. He invites us to delve into “ruins thinking” and an “epistemology of coordination” to inhabit this condition and re-territorialize infrastructures. Luigi Pellizzoni interrogates whether the Anthropocene narrative represents a break from or continuity with late capitalist modernity’s politics of time. Addressing the concept of “non-trivial futures”, he argues that the Anthropocene aligns with and strengthens capitalism’s recursive temporality and secular eschatology, opening space for conservative or reactionary designs. Finally, Paolo Savoia traces a “revival” of natural history in the environmental humanities, enabled by temporal short-circuits between the 16th and 21st centuries. Early modern natural history is revealed as preluding anthropology that blurred nature-culture divides and anticipates a notion of “third nature” which challenges the scalability logic characteristic of modernity.https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/21165anthropoceneregime of historicitypolitics of timeinfrastructural capitalismuncertizenshipnatural history |
spellingShingle | Vando Borghi Luigi Pellizzoni Paolo Savoia Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene Tecnoscienza anthropocene regime of historicity politics of time infrastructural capitalism uncertizenship natural history |
title | Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene |
title_full | Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene |
title_fullStr | Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene |
title_full_unstemmed | Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene |
title_short | Time, Infrastructure and Knowledge: Rethinking Temporality in the Anthropocene |
title_sort | time infrastructure and knowledge rethinking temporality in the anthropocene |
topic | anthropocene regime of historicity politics of time infrastructural capitalism uncertizenship natural history |
url | https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/21165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandoborghi timeinfrastructureandknowledgerethinkingtemporalityintheanthropocene AT luigipellizzoni timeinfrastructureandknowledgerethinkingtemporalityintheanthropocene AT paolosavoia timeinfrastructureandknowledgerethinkingtemporalityintheanthropocene |