Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all effectiveness trials for a specific health area. This will allow results of studies to be compared, contrasted and combined as appropriate, as well as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Elizabeth Gargon, Binu Gurung, Nancy Medley, Doug G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Paula R Williamson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099111 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
by: Katherine Davis, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)