Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted (T2w) MR urography (MRU) techniques — the standard MRU using fast spin echo (FSE) and postprocessing maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the single-shot MRU — in the diagnosis of ureteric obstruction in patients with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, Ahmed Shokeir, Huda Rafaie, Tarek El-Diasty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.66
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849400669131243520
author Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
Ahmed Shokeir
Huda Rafaie
Tarek El-Diasty
author_facet Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
Ahmed Shokeir
Huda Rafaie
Tarek El-Diasty
author_sort Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted (T2w) MR urography (MRU) techniques — the standard MRU using fast spin echo (FSE) and postprocessing maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the single-shot MRU — in the diagnosis of ureteric obstruction in patients with noncalcular urinary obstruction. The study included 150 patients admitted to our center between January 2005 and December 2006. There were 203 renal units with noncalcular obstruction; 53 patients had bilateral obstruction. Patients with calcular obstruction were excluded. There were 85 males and 65 females with a mean age of 50 (range: 5–83) years. All patients were examined with static MRU using both single-shot (thick slab) and multisection MRU. Using single-shot MRU, we obtained images at the direct coronal and oblique coronal, as well as sagittal, planes for each renal unit. Postprocessing MIP for the standard coronal heavy T2 source images to obtain coronal and oblique images was done. Among the obstructed 203 units, the intrinsic causes were present in 157 units (151 were stricture and six were ureteric tumors), while the extrinsic causes were present in 46 units (35 bladder tumor, four ureterocele, five retroperitoneal fibrosis, one prostatic tumor, and one local pelvic recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer). The overall accuracy of single-shot MRU was 89% and was 93% for the multisection MRU in cases of intrinsic ureteric obstruction, while in cases of extrinsic obstruction, it was 20% for single-shot MRU and 96% for multisection MRU. T2w static MRU is a very useful technique in diagnosing noncalcular ureteric obstruction. Multisection MRU has a high diagnostic accuracy and reliability over that of the single-shot technique. The single-section technique is very rapid and useful in diagnosing ureteric stricture so it could be used as a localizer, while multisection images with postprocessing MIP is mandatory, especially in cases of suspected ureteric tumors or extraureteric causes.
format Article
id doaj-art-82549e7541d5468d8a34e82e8088e22d
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-82549e7541d5468d8a34e82e8088e22d2025-08-20T03:37:57ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2008-01-01845446210.1100/tsw.2008.66Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two TechniquesMohamed Abou El-Ghar0Ahmed Shokeir1Huda Rafaie2Tarek El-Diasty3Radiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptThe purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted (T2w) MR urography (MRU) techniques — the standard MRU using fast spin echo (FSE) and postprocessing maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the single-shot MRU — in the diagnosis of ureteric obstruction in patients with noncalcular urinary obstruction. The study included 150 patients admitted to our center between January 2005 and December 2006. There were 203 renal units with noncalcular obstruction; 53 patients had bilateral obstruction. Patients with calcular obstruction were excluded. There were 85 males and 65 females with a mean age of 50 (range: 5–83) years. All patients were examined with static MRU using both single-shot (thick slab) and multisection MRU. Using single-shot MRU, we obtained images at the direct coronal and oblique coronal, as well as sagittal, planes for each renal unit. Postprocessing MIP for the standard coronal heavy T2 source images to obtain coronal and oblique images was done. Among the obstructed 203 units, the intrinsic causes were present in 157 units (151 were stricture and six were ureteric tumors), while the extrinsic causes were present in 46 units (35 bladder tumor, four ureterocele, five retroperitoneal fibrosis, one prostatic tumor, and one local pelvic recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer). The overall accuracy of single-shot MRU was 89% and was 93% for the multisection MRU in cases of intrinsic ureteric obstruction, while in cases of extrinsic obstruction, it was 20% for single-shot MRU and 96% for multisection MRU. T2w static MRU is a very useful technique in diagnosing noncalcular ureteric obstruction. Multisection MRU has a high diagnostic accuracy and reliability over that of the single-shot technique. The single-section technique is very rapid and useful in diagnosing ureteric stricture so it could be used as a localizer, while multisection images with postprocessing MIP is mandatory, especially in cases of suspected ureteric tumors or extraureteric causes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.66
spellingShingle Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
Ahmed Shokeir
Huda Rafaie
Tarek El-Diasty
Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
The Scientific World Journal
title Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
title_full Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
title_fullStr Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
title_short Static T2w MRU in Noncalcular Urinary Obstruction: Comparison of Its Two Techniques
title_sort static t2w mru in noncalcular urinary obstruction comparison of its two techniques
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.66
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedabouelghar statict2wmruinnoncalcularurinaryobstructioncomparisonofitstwotechniques
AT ahmedshokeir statict2wmruinnoncalcularurinaryobstructioncomparisonofitstwotechniques
AT hudarafaie statict2wmruinnoncalcularurinaryobstructioncomparisonofitstwotechniques
AT tarekeldiasty statict2wmruinnoncalcularurinaryobstructioncomparisonofitstwotechniques