PEEP or No PEEP: That Is Not the Question
Generally, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied to improve oxygenation, and has been shown to improve gas exchange and lung compliance in acute lung injury, but it is not without risk. To date, no controlled outcome studies have been published to demonstrate the best method of choosing...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jesús Villar, Arthur S Slutsky |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
1996-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Respiratory Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1996/241209 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Is There Any Association between PEEP and Upper Extremity DVT?
by: Farah Al-Saffar, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills-Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP): a diagnostic accuracy study
by: Simone Nicolini de Simoni, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
by: Martin Thomas, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Utility of Pulse Oximetry Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) with Incorporation of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (SpO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP) for Classification and Prognostication of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
by: Pratibha Todur, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Outcome from Acute Repsiratory Distress Syndrome: Is It Really Improving?
by: Jesús Villar, et al.
Published: (1996-01-01)