History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes

The article examines the importance of the discipline of “History and Philosophy of Science” in the context of a new model for training doctoral students. The Russian universities and institutions of higher education should begin its implementation in September 2021. The author analyzes the history...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. N. Ishchenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2021-09-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2944
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574452570783744
author E. N. Ishchenko
author_facet E. N. Ishchenko
author_sort E. N. Ishchenko
collection DOAJ
description The article examines the importance of the discipline of “History and Philosophy of Science” in the context of a new model for training doctoral students. The Russian universities and institutions of higher education should begin its implementation in September 2021. The author analyzes the history of the development and implementation of the course of “History and Philosophy of Science” as an academic discipline, which took place against the background of transformations in doctoral education. The article shows that the significant efforts of the professional philosophical community aimed at conceptualizing the methodological and methodical foundations of the discipline were successful and played an important role in the process of training doctoral students. The professional community not only gave an adequate response to the challenge of the educational reform, but also used it as a chance for renewal, realization of its own scientific and pedagogical potential. The transition to a new model of doctoral education, taking into account the modern realities of the knowledge society, should take into account the need to form critical thinking in postgraduate students as the most important competence. The change of focus from educational training to research component should not lead to utilitarian approach implementation aimed at purely quantitative indicators. The high quality of training future researchers, and focus on the development of human capital meet the challenges posed by the contemporary knowledge society.
format Article
id doaj-art-823747bbb68e47b2ae1b21abc4b90248
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-823747bbb68e47b2ae1b21abc4b902482025-02-01T13:14:29ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592021-09-01308-915816710.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-8-9-158-1671832History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical NotesE. N. Ishchenko0Voronezh State UniversityThe article examines the importance of the discipline of “History and Philosophy of Science” in the context of a new model for training doctoral students. The Russian universities and institutions of higher education should begin its implementation in September 2021. The author analyzes the history of the development and implementation of the course of “History and Philosophy of Science” as an academic discipline, which took place against the background of transformations in doctoral education. The article shows that the significant efforts of the professional philosophical community aimed at conceptualizing the methodological and methodical foundations of the discipline were successful and played an important role in the process of training doctoral students. The professional community not only gave an adequate response to the challenge of the educational reform, but also used it as a chance for renewal, realization of its own scientific and pedagogical potential. The transition to a new model of doctoral education, taking into account the modern realities of the knowledge society, should take into account the need to form critical thinking in postgraduate students as the most important competence. The change of focus from educational training to research component should not lead to utilitarian approach implementation aimed at purely quantitative indicators. The high quality of training future researchers, and focus on the development of human capital meet the challenges posed by the contemporary knowledge society.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2944history and philosophy of sciencedoctoral educationreforms of educationdigital revolutionknowledge society
spellingShingle E. N. Ishchenko
History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
Высшее образование в России
history and philosophy of science
doctoral education
reforms of education
digital revolution
knowledge society
title History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
title_full History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
title_fullStr History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
title_full_unstemmed History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
title_short History and Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads of Doctoral Education’s Reforms: Polemical Notes
title_sort history and philosophy of science at the crossroads of doctoral education s reforms polemical notes
topic history and philosophy of science
doctoral education
reforms of education
digital revolution
knowledge society
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2944
work_keys_str_mv AT enishchenko historyandphilosophyofscienceatthecrossroadsofdoctoraleducationsreformspolemicalnotes