Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies

This article presents a comparative analysis of the crucial physical properties of electrically conductive components made of pure copper, produced by various additive manufacturing technologies such as binder jetting (BJ) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). The comparison concerned the assessm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Witold Malec, Joanna Kulasa, Anna Brudny, Anna Hury, Bartlomiej Adamczyk, Ryszard Rzepecki, Robert Sekula, Grzegorz Kmita, Andrzej Rybak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-08-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/14/9/975
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850260170864590848
author Witold Malec
Joanna Kulasa
Anna Brudny
Anna Hury
Bartlomiej Adamczyk
Ryszard Rzepecki
Robert Sekula
Grzegorz Kmita
Andrzej Rybak
author_facet Witold Malec
Joanna Kulasa
Anna Brudny
Anna Hury
Bartlomiej Adamczyk
Ryszard Rzepecki
Robert Sekula
Grzegorz Kmita
Andrzej Rybak
author_sort Witold Malec
collection DOAJ
description This article presents a comparative analysis of the crucial physical properties of electrically conductive components made of pure copper, produced by various additive manufacturing technologies such as binder jetting (BJ) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). The comparison concerned the assessment of critical parameters important from the application point of view, such as: electrical conductivity, hardness, yield point, microstructure and the occurrence of internal material defects. Same-sized components made in a conventional casting and subtractive method (machining) were used as a reference material. Comprehensive tests and the comparison of a wide range of parameters allowed us to determine that among the selected methods, printing using the DMLS technique allowed for obtaining arcing contact with mechanical and electrical parameters very similar to the reference element. Therefore, the obtained results showed the possibility of using the copper elements made by additive manufacturing for the switching and protection devices used in electrification and energy distribution industrial sectors.
format Article
id doaj-art-82268efb0a0945718dee3128ea87d177
institution OA Journals
issn 2075-4701
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metals
spelling doaj-art-82268efb0a0945718dee3128ea87d1772025-08-20T01:55:41ZengMDPI AGMetals2075-47012024-08-0114997510.3390/met14090975Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing TechnologiesWitold Malec0Joanna Kulasa1Anna Brudny2Anna Hury3Bartlomiej Adamczyk4Ryszard Rzepecki5Robert Sekula6Grzegorz Kmita7Andrzej Rybak8Łukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowinskiego 5, 44-121 Gliwice, PolandŁukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowinskiego 5, 44-121 Gliwice, PolandŁukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowinskiego 5, 44-121 Gliwice, PolandŁukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowinskiego 5, 44-121 Gliwice, PolandABB Corporate Technology Center, Starowislna 13A, 31-038 Krakow, PolandABB Corporate Technology Center, Starowislna 13A, 31-038 Krakow, PolandHitachi Energy Research, Pawia 7, 31-154 Krakow, PolandHitachi Energy Research, Pawia 7, 31-154 Krakow, PolandABB Corporate Technology Center, Starowislna 13A, 31-038 Krakow, PolandThis article presents a comparative analysis of the crucial physical properties of electrically conductive components made of pure copper, produced by various additive manufacturing technologies such as binder jetting (BJ) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). The comparison concerned the assessment of critical parameters important from the application point of view, such as: electrical conductivity, hardness, yield point, microstructure and the occurrence of internal material defects. Same-sized components made in a conventional casting and subtractive method (machining) were used as a reference material. Comprehensive tests and the comparison of a wide range of parameters allowed us to determine that among the selected methods, printing using the DMLS technique allowed for obtaining arcing contact with mechanical and electrical parameters very similar to the reference element. Therefore, the obtained results showed the possibility of using the copper elements made by additive manufacturing for the switching and protection devices used in electrification and energy distribution industrial sectors.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/14/9/975copperadditive manufacturingmetallography3D printingmachining
spellingShingle Witold Malec
Joanna Kulasa
Anna Brudny
Anna Hury
Bartlomiej Adamczyk
Ryszard Rzepecki
Robert Sekula
Grzegorz Kmita
Andrzej Rybak
Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
Metals
copper
additive manufacturing
metallography
3D printing
machining
title Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_full Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_fullStr Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_short Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_sort comparative studies of the properties of copper components conventional vs additive manufacturing technologies
topic copper
additive manufacturing
metallography
3D printing
machining
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/14/9/975
work_keys_str_mv AT witoldmalec comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT joannakulasa comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT annabrudny comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT annahury comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT bartlomiejadamczyk comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT ryszardrzepecki comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT robertsekula comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT grzegorzkmita comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT andrzejrybak comparativestudiesofthepropertiesofcoppercomponentsconventionalvsadditivemanufacturingtechnologies