Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom
Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risk...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | EFSA Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849318794762125312 |
|---|---|
| author | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Claude Bragard Paula Baptista Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Paolo Gonthier Josep Anton Jaques Miret Annemarie Fejer Justesen Alan MacLeod Christer Sven Magnusson Panagiotis Milonas Juan A. Navas‐Cortes Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Philippe Lucien Reignault Emilio Stefani Hans‐Hermann Thulke Wopke Van der Werf Antonio Vicent Civera Lucia Zappalà Andrea Lucchi Pedro Gómez Gregor Urek Umberto Bernardo Giovanni Bubici Anna Vittoria Carluccio Michela Chiumenti Francesco Di Serio Elena Fanelli Cristina Marzachì Paraskevi Kariampa Cristiana Do Vale Correia Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz Agata Kaczmarek Jonathan Yuen |
| author_facet | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Claude Bragard Paula Baptista Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Paolo Gonthier Josep Anton Jaques Miret Annemarie Fejer Justesen Alan MacLeod Christer Sven Magnusson Panagiotis Milonas Juan A. Navas‐Cortes Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Philippe Lucien Reignault Emilio Stefani Hans‐Hermann Thulke Wopke Van der Werf Antonio Vicent Civera Lucia Zappalà Andrea Lucchi Pedro Gómez Gregor Urek Umberto Bernardo Giovanni Bubici Anna Vittoria Carluccio Michela Chiumenti Francesco Di Serio Elena Fanelli Cristina Marzachì Paraskevi Kariampa Cristiana Do Vale Correia Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz Agata Kaczmarek Jonathan Yuen |
| author_sort | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Prunus avium possibly grafted on rootstocks of either P. avium, P. canescens, P. cerasus, P. pseudocerasus or their hybrids imported from the UK, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Three quarantine pests Scirtothrips dorsalis, tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus), one protected zone EU quarantine pest (Bemisia tabaci (European population), and three non‐ regulated pests (Colletotrichum aenigma, Eulecanium excrescens and Takahashia japonica) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. The risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical Dossier from the UK were evaluated, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom, taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Colletotrichum aenigma being the pest most frequently expected on the imported potted plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9971 and 10,000 plants per 10,000 would be free from the above‐mentioned fungus. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-81f58d6fd5b14e0d9b47b5ccfd156e65 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1831-4732 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-07-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EFSA Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-81f58d6fd5b14e0d9b47b5ccfd156e652025-08-20T03:50:44ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322024-07-01227n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United KingdomEFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Claude BragardPaula BaptistaElisavet ChatzivassiliouPaolo GonthierJosep Anton Jaques MiretAnnemarie Fejer JustesenAlan MacLeodChrister Sven MagnussonPanagiotis MilonasJuan A. Navas‐CortesStephen ParnellRoel PottingPhilippe Lucien ReignaultEmilio StefaniHans‐Hermann ThulkeWopke Van der WerfAntonio Vicent CiveraLucia ZappalàAndrea LucchiPedro GómezGregor UrekUmberto BernardoGiovanni BubiciAnna Vittoria CarluccioMichela ChiumentiFrancesco Di SerioElena FanelliCristina MarzachìParaskevi KariampaCristiana Do Vale CorreiaOlaf Mosbach‐SchulzAgata KaczmarekJonathan YuenAbstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Prunus avium possibly grafted on rootstocks of either P. avium, P. canescens, P. cerasus, P. pseudocerasus or their hybrids imported from the UK, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Three quarantine pests Scirtothrips dorsalis, tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus), one protected zone EU quarantine pest (Bemisia tabaci (European population), and three non‐ regulated pests (Colletotrichum aenigma, Eulecanium excrescens and Takahashia japonica) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. The risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical Dossier from the UK were evaluated, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom, taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Colletotrichum aenigma being the pest most frequently expected on the imported potted plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9971 and 10,000 plants per 10,000 would be free from the above‐mentioned fungus.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836cherryEuropean Unionpathway risk assessmentplant healthplant pestquarantine |
| spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Claude Bragard Paula Baptista Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Paolo Gonthier Josep Anton Jaques Miret Annemarie Fejer Justesen Alan MacLeod Christer Sven Magnusson Panagiotis Milonas Juan A. Navas‐Cortes Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Philippe Lucien Reignault Emilio Stefani Hans‐Hermann Thulke Wopke Van der Werf Antonio Vicent Civera Lucia Zappalà Andrea Lucchi Pedro Gómez Gregor Urek Umberto Bernardo Giovanni Bubici Anna Vittoria Carluccio Michela Chiumenti Francesco Di Serio Elena Fanelli Cristina Marzachì Paraskevi Kariampa Cristiana Do Vale Correia Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz Agata Kaczmarek Jonathan Yuen Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom EFSA Journal cherry European Union pathway risk assessment plant health plant pest quarantine |
| title | Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom |
| title_full | Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom |
| title_fullStr | Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom |
| title_full_unstemmed | Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom |
| title_short | Commodity risk assessment of Prunus avium plants from United Kingdom |
| title_sort | commodity risk assessment of prunus avium plants from united kingdom |
| topic | cherry European Union pathway risk assessment plant health plant pest quarantine |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelonplanthealthplh commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT claudebragard commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT paulabaptista commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT elisavetchatzivassiliou commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT paologonthier commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT josepantonjaquesmiret commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT annemariefejerjustesen commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT alanmacleod commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT christersvenmagnusson commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT panagiotismilonas commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT juananavascortes commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT stephenparnell commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT roelpotting commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT philippelucienreignault commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT emiliostefani commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT hanshermannthulke commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT wopkevanderwerf commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT antoniovicentcivera commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT luciazappala commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT andrealucchi commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT pedrogomez commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT gregorurek commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT umbertobernardo commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT giovannibubici commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT annavittoriacarluccio commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT michelachiumenti commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT francescodiserio commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT elenafanelli commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT cristinamarzachi commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT paraskevikariampa commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT cristianadovalecorreia commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT olafmosbachschulz commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT agatakaczmarek commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom AT jonathanyuen commodityriskassessmentofprunusaviumplantsfromunitedkingdom |