Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey

Abstract Background Orbital decompression is recommended for TED especially in the treatment of severe, refractory cases yet there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal surgical approach. Previously conducted surveys assessed variations in the management of TED but only amongst ophthalmologi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan C. Higgins, Ciaran F. Lane, Neerav Goyal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70051
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850101487791767552
author Ryan C. Higgins
Ciaran F. Lane
Neerav Goyal
author_facet Ryan C. Higgins
Ciaran F. Lane
Neerav Goyal
author_sort Ryan C. Higgins
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Orbital decompression is recommended for TED especially in the treatment of severe, refractory cases yet there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal surgical approach. Previously conducted surveys assessed variations in the management of TED but only amongst ophthalmologists. Our study attempts to better characterize surgical and perioperative preferences amongst otolaryngologists in the management of TED. Methods A survey was administered to the American Rhinologic Society and Canadian Society of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery via REDCap with 52 total respondents. Respondent demographic information and pre‐operative management, procedural specifics, and post‐operative management preferences were collected. Results The majority of respondents practiced in a metropolitan (82.7%), academic setting (73.1%) and received subspecialty training in Rhinology & Skull Base Surgery (88.9%). Most elected for corticosteroids (63.5%) and medical management (69.2%) prior to orbital decompression but did not use any classification system (86.5%). Orbital decompression was most often done with ophthalmology collaboration (71.2%). Removal of two bony walls (55.8%) via medial wall (97.9%) and orbital floor (72.3%) removal was most preferred. Removal of one orbital fat aspect (60.6%) via the medial fat pad was most preferred. Combined bone and fat removal (59.6%) completed via an endoscopic approach (71.2% and 97.0%, respectively) was most common. Post‐operatively, most patients were not admitted (88.4%) with saline nasal rinses (92.3%) utilized by most respondents. Conclusions This survey completed by otolaryngologists highlights several key distinctions in the preferred surgical approach during orbital decompression and the perioperative management of TED when compared to ophthalmologists and current recommendations. Level of evidence Level 4.
format Article
id doaj-art-81e8ea55ca0c4dc1b815097e7a110925
institution DOAJ
issn 2378-8038
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
spelling doaj-art-81e8ea55ca0c4dc1b815097e7a1109252025-08-20T02:39:59ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382024-12-0196n/an/a10.1002/lio2.70051Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American surveyRyan C. Higgins0Ciaran F. Lane1Neerav Goyal2Department of Otolaryngology University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USADepartment of Otolaryngology University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba CanadaDepartment of Otolaryngology The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USAAbstract Background Orbital decompression is recommended for TED especially in the treatment of severe, refractory cases yet there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal surgical approach. Previously conducted surveys assessed variations in the management of TED but only amongst ophthalmologists. Our study attempts to better characterize surgical and perioperative preferences amongst otolaryngologists in the management of TED. Methods A survey was administered to the American Rhinologic Society and Canadian Society of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery via REDCap with 52 total respondents. Respondent demographic information and pre‐operative management, procedural specifics, and post‐operative management preferences were collected. Results The majority of respondents practiced in a metropolitan (82.7%), academic setting (73.1%) and received subspecialty training in Rhinology & Skull Base Surgery (88.9%). Most elected for corticosteroids (63.5%) and medical management (69.2%) prior to orbital decompression but did not use any classification system (86.5%). Orbital decompression was most often done with ophthalmology collaboration (71.2%). Removal of two bony walls (55.8%) via medial wall (97.9%) and orbital floor (72.3%) removal was most preferred. Removal of one orbital fat aspect (60.6%) via the medial fat pad was most preferred. Combined bone and fat removal (59.6%) completed via an endoscopic approach (71.2% and 97.0%, respectively) was most common. Post‐operatively, most patients were not admitted (88.4%) with saline nasal rinses (92.3%) utilized by most respondents. Conclusions This survey completed by otolaryngologists highlights several key distinctions in the preferred surgical approach during orbital decompression and the perioperative management of TED when compared to ophthalmologists and current recommendations. Level of evidence Level 4.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70051endoscopyorbital decompressionotolaryngologythyroid eye disease
spellingShingle Ryan C. Higgins
Ciaran F. Lane
Neerav Goyal
Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
endoscopy
orbital decompression
otolaryngology
thyroid eye disease
title Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
title_full Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
title_fullStr Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
title_full_unstemmed Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
title_short Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey
title_sort otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease a north american survey
topic endoscopy
orbital decompression
otolaryngology
thyroid eye disease
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70051
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanchiggins otolaryngologistsurgicalpreferencesfororbitaldecompressioninthyroideyediseaseanorthamericansurvey
AT ciaranflane otolaryngologistsurgicalpreferencesfororbitaldecompressioninthyroideyediseaseanorthamericansurvey
AT neeravgoyal otolaryngologistsurgicalpreferencesfororbitaldecompressioninthyroideyediseaseanorthamericansurvey