A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions

This paper attempts to make two contributions to discussions related to TEI: (1) an analysis of how tools used for working with TEI documents encourage certain values and make certain assumptions about the work of textual editing and (2) a report on a methodological framework from outside the humani...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Carter
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Text Encoding Initiative Consortium 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/974
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578498567340032
author Daniel Carter
author_facet Daniel Carter
author_sort Daniel Carter
collection DOAJ
description This paper attempts to make two contributions to discussions related to TEI: (1) an analysis of how tools used for working with TEI documents encourage certain values and make certain assumptions about the work of textual editing and (2) a report on a methodological framework from outside the humanities that suggests a unique way to study such systems. Borrowing models of design research from the fields of design and human-computer interaction, I argue that prototypes can be used to create new conceptual knowledge, to investigate the values and assumptions of sociotechnical systems, and to communicate alternative visions of those systems. I first analyze an existing tool, the Versioning Machine, as a way of focusing the design of a prototype that reimagines several aspects of that original—specifically, I argue that the Versioning Machine creates an environment that to some extent assumes that TEI documents are created by one editor and intended for one instantiation. The prototype presented experiments with an alternative vision of textual editing as bringing encoded texts and interpretations together in multiple and flexible instantiations. Rather than a technical problem with an optimal solution, I approach this design process as an opportunity to ask how prototypes can give designers access to conceptual issues and allow users to enact alternative values and imagine alternative futures. This research was supported by the Modernist Versions Project, which is funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Partnership Development Grant.
format Article
id doaj-art-81d358d90cbc4acaa16b43be9899d8a3
institution Kabale University
issn 2162-5603
language deu
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Text Encoding Initiative Consortium
record_format Article
series Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative
spelling doaj-art-81d358d90cbc4acaa16b43be9899d8a32025-01-30T13:56:23ZdeuText Encoding Initiative ConsortiumJournal of the Text Encoding Initiative2162-56032014-01-01710.4000/jtei.974A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and AssumptionsDaniel CarterThis paper attempts to make two contributions to discussions related to TEI: (1) an analysis of how tools used for working with TEI documents encourage certain values and make certain assumptions about the work of textual editing and (2) a report on a methodological framework from outside the humanities that suggests a unique way to study such systems. Borrowing models of design research from the fields of design and human-computer interaction, I argue that prototypes can be used to create new conceptual knowledge, to investigate the values and assumptions of sociotechnical systems, and to communicate alternative visions of those systems. I first analyze an existing tool, the Versioning Machine, as a way of focusing the design of a prototype that reimagines several aspects of that original—specifically, I argue that the Versioning Machine creates an environment that to some extent assumes that TEI documents are created by one editor and intended for one instantiation. The prototype presented experiments with an alternative vision of textual editing as bringing encoded texts and interpretations together in multiple and flexible instantiations. Rather than a technical problem with an optimal solution, I approach this design process as an opportunity to ask how prototypes can give designers access to conceptual issues and allow users to enact alternative values and imagine alternative futures. This research was supported by the Modernist Versions Project, which is funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Partnership Development Grant.https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/974tool developmentinterface developmentscholarly editingversioningdesign researchprototypes
spellingShingle Daniel Carter
A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative
tool development
interface development
scholarly editing
versioning
design research
prototypes
title A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
title_full A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
title_fullStr A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
title_full_unstemmed A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
title_short A Design Methodology for Exploring and Communicating System Values and Assumptions
title_sort design methodology for exploring and communicating system values and assumptions
topic tool development
interface development
scholarly editing
versioning
design research
prototypes
url https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/974
work_keys_str_mv AT danielcarter adesignmethodologyforexploringandcommunicatingsystemvaluesandassumptions
AT danielcarter designmethodologyforexploringandcommunicatingsystemvaluesandassumptions