Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data
The bootstrap (resampling) methods of construction of confidence intervals (c.i.) are considered. The c.i. obtained are compared with each other and with the standard student c.i. by simulation. The study is based on a real biological data about distribution of badger, fox, and raccoon dog borrow...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2002-12-01
|
| Series: | Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys |
| Online Access: | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/LMR/article/view/32990 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825197252868571136 |
|---|---|
| author | Alesia Kanopaitė Eduardas Mickevičius Marijus Radavičius |
| author_facet | Alesia Kanopaitė Eduardas Mickevičius Marijus Radavičius |
| author_sort | Alesia Kanopaitė |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The bootstrap (resampling) methods of construction of confidence intervals (c.i.) are considered. The c.i. obtained are compared with each other and with the standard student c.i. by simulation. The study is based on a real biological data about distribution of badger, fox, and raccoon dog borrow number in 1 km2 square areas uniformly allocated throughout Lithuania territory. The distributions take only a few nonzero values with relatively large proportion of zeros, are very skewed and have irregular tails. In this case the normal approximation, the student c.i. is based on, of the distribution of the sample mean is not sufficiently accurate for small samples.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-81be2ba39bf2421e9d1dbecd55bf6634 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0132-2818 2335-898X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2002-12-01 |
| publisher | Vilnius University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys |
| spelling | doaj-art-81be2ba39bf2421e9d1dbecd55bf66342025-02-11T18:13:17ZengVilnius University PressLietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys0132-28182335-898X2002-12-0142spec.10.15388/LMR.2002.32990Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological dataAlesia Kanopaitė0Eduardas Mickevičius1Marijus Radavičius2Vilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInstitute of EcologyVilnius Gediminas Technical University The bootstrap (resampling) methods of construction of confidence intervals (c.i.) are considered. The c.i. obtained are compared with each other and with the standard student c.i. by simulation. The study is based on a real biological data about distribution of badger, fox, and raccoon dog borrow number in 1 km2 square areas uniformly allocated throughout Lithuania territory. The distributions take only a few nonzero values with relatively large proportion of zeros, are very skewed and have irregular tails. In this case the normal approximation, the student c.i. is based on, of the distribution of the sample mean is not sufficiently accurate for small samples. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/LMR/article/view/32990 |
| spellingShingle | Alesia Kanopaitė Eduardas Mickevičius Marijus Radavičius Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys |
| title | Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| title_full | Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| title_short | Comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| title_sort | comparison of confidence interval construction methods for discrete biological data |
| url | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/LMR/article/view/32990 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alesiakanopaite comparisonofconfidenceintervalconstructionmethodsfordiscretebiologicaldata AT eduardasmickevicius comparisonofconfidenceintervalconstructionmethodsfordiscretebiologicaldata AT marijusradavicius comparisonofconfidenceintervalconstructionmethodsfordiscretebiologicaldata |