Cosserat Rod-Based Tendon Friction Modeling, Simulation, and Experiments for Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots

Traditional tendon-driven continuum robot (TDCR) models based on Cosserat rod theory often assume that tendon tension is a continuous wrench along the backbone. However, this assumption overlooks critical factors, including the discrete arrangement of disks, the segmented configuration of tensioned...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Honghong Wang, Jingli Du, Yi Mao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Micromachines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/16/3/346
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Traditional tendon-driven continuum robot (TDCR) models based on Cosserat rod theory often assume that tendon tension is a continuous wrench along the backbone. However, this assumption overlooks critical factors, including the discrete arrangement of disks, the segmented configuration of tensioned tendons, and the friction between tendons and guide holes. Additionally, tendon forces are not continuous but discrete, concentrated wrenches, with the frictional force magnitude and direction varying based on the TDCR’s bending configuration. We propose a TDCR modeling method that integrates Cosserat rod theory with a finite element approach to address these limitations. We construct a Cosserat rod model for the robot’s backbone, discretize the tendon geometry using the finite element method (FEM), and incorporate friction modeling between tendons and guide holes. Furthermore, we introduce an algorithm to determine the direction of friction forces, enhancing modeling accuracy. This approach results in a more realistic and comprehensive mathematical representation of TDCR behavior. Numerical simulations under various tendon-routing scenarios are conducted and compared with classical TDCR models. The results indicate that our friction-inclusive model improves accuracy, yielding an average configuration deviation of only 0.3% across different tendon routings. Experimental validation further confirms the model’s accuracy and robustness.
ISSN:2072-666X