Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination

While the evolutionist hypothesis was gaining ground in the early decades of the nineteenth century and paleontology showed that species had existed and become extinct, many natural scientists were led to think that the fantastic animals which peopled classical mythologies maybe were not the fantasi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Béatrice Laurent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2017-03-01
Series:Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/cve/3188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581244008792064
author Béatrice Laurent
author_facet Béatrice Laurent
author_sort Béatrice Laurent
collection DOAJ
description While the evolutionist hypothesis was gaining ground in the early decades of the nineteenth century and paleontology showed that species had existed and become extinct, many natural scientists were led to think that the fantastic animals which peopled classical mythologies maybe were not the fantasies of creative minds but lost species. In this context, mermaids that had been household names for ages were perceived as hybrid creatures, possibly even missing links between the aquatic and terrestrial forms of life. Moreover, the mermaid species did not seem wholly extinct: some were reported to have been sighted off the coast of Scotland as recently as in 1809 and 1812, and when the Feejee mermaid was exhibited in London in 1822, it raised a zoological debate. While some scientists such as Sir Everard Home seriously suspected a hoax, others, including Dr Rees Price, were convinced that the mermaid was the ‘found link’ in the chain of evolution, and were ready to accept it in the grand table of living beings in the space that Linnaeus, the father of taxonomy, had left especially blank because he thought that mermaids might exist. Nineteenth-century audiences were used to oddities. The newly discovered platypus was a more puzzling creature than the mermaid after all, but it clearly was an animal. Human ‘monsters’ such as Siamese twins or Joseph Merrick, the ‘Elephant Man’, were known and toured in fairs, but their humanity was not disputed. A contemporary form of human-animal hybridism, however, raised serious questions about the ontological definition of human nature. What started as a zoological debate heated up in an intellectual war because the ‘mermaid question’ was imbedded in larger issues related to hybridism. This paper purposes to explore these issues and to follow their development throughout the Victorian period.
format Article
id doaj-art-81857e6d343e4b1d9f628b67db28230f
institution Kabale University
issn 0220-5610
2271-6149
language English
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
spelling doaj-art-81857e6d343e4b1d9f628b67db28230f2025-01-30T10:22:03ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeCahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens0220-56102271-61492017-03-018510.4000/cve.3188Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian ImaginationBéatrice LaurentWhile the evolutionist hypothesis was gaining ground in the early decades of the nineteenth century and paleontology showed that species had existed and become extinct, many natural scientists were led to think that the fantastic animals which peopled classical mythologies maybe were not the fantasies of creative minds but lost species. In this context, mermaids that had been household names for ages were perceived as hybrid creatures, possibly even missing links between the aquatic and terrestrial forms of life. Moreover, the mermaid species did not seem wholly extinct: some were reported to have been sighted off the coast of Scotland as recently as in 1809 and 1812, and when the Feejee mermaid was exhibited in London in 1822, it raised a zoological debate. While some scientists such as Sir Everard Home seriously suspected a hoax, others, including Dr Rees Price, were convinced that the mermaid was the ‘found link’ in the chain of evolution, and were ready to accept it in the grand table of living beings in the space that Linnaeus, the father of taxonomy, had left especially blank because he thought that mermaids might exist. Nineteenth-century audiences were used to oddities. The newly discovered platypus was a more puzzling creature than the mermaid after all, but it clearly was an animal. Human ‘monsters’ such as Siamese twins or Joseph Merrick, the ‘Elephant Man’, were known and toured in fairs, but their humanity was not disputed. A contemporary form of human-animal hybridism, however, raised serious questions about the ontological definition of human nature. What started as a zoological debate heated up in an intellectual war because the ‘mermaid question’ was imbedded in larger issues related to hybridism. This paper purposes to explore these issues and to follow their development throughout the Victorian period.https://journals.openedition.org/cve/3188MermaidDarwin (Charles)EvolutionismMythologyMissing linkHybrid
spellingShingle Béatrice Laurent
Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Mermaid
Darwin (Charles)
Evolutionism
Mythology
Missing link
Hybrid
title Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
title_full Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
title_fullStr Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
title_full_unstemmed Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
title_short Monster or Missing Link? The Mermaid and the Victorian Imagination
title_sort monster or missing link the mermaid and the victorian imagination
topic Mermaid
Darwin (Charles)
Evolutionism
Mythology
Missing link
Hybrid
url https://journals.openedition.org/cve/3188
work_keys_str_mv AT beatricelaurent monsterormissinglinkthemermaidandthevictorianimagination