Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables

In a prospective study, we examined the recovery trajectory of patients with lower extremity fractures to better understand the healing process in the absence of complications. Using a chest-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) device for gait analysis and collecting patient-reported outcome meas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mostafa Rezapour, Rachel B. Seymour, Suman Medda, Stephen H. Sims, Madhav A. Karunakar, Nahir Habet, Metin Nafi Gurcan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/67
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589053066739712
author Mostafa Rezapour
Rachel B. Seymour
Suman Medda
Stephen H. Sims
Madhav A. Karunakar
Nahir Habet
Metin Nafi Gurcan
author_facet Mostafa Rezapour
Rachel B. Seymour
Suman Medda
Stephen H. Sims
Madhav A. Karunakar
Nahir Habet
Metin Nafi Gurcan
author_sort Mostafa Rezapour
collection DOAJ
description In a prospective study, we examined the recovery trajectory of patients with lower extremity fractures to better understand the healing process in the absence of complications. Using a chest-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) device for gait analysis and collecting patient-reported outcome measures, we focused on 12 key gait variables, including Mean Leg Lift Acceleration, Stance Time, and Body Orientation. We employed a linear mixed model (LMM) to analyze these variables over time, incorporating both fixed and random effects to account for individual differences and the time since injury. This model also adjusted for varying intervals between assessments. Our study provided insights into gait recovery across different fracture types using data from 318 patients who experienced no complications or readmissions during their recovery. Through LMM analysis, we found that Tibia-Distal fractures demonstrated the fastest recovery, particularly in terms of mobility and strength. Tibia-Proximal fractures showed balanced improvements in both mobility and stability, suggesting that rehabilitation should target both strength and balance. Femur fractures exhibited varied recovery, with Diaphyseal fractures showing clear improvements in stability, while Distal fractures reflected gains in limb strength but with some variability in stability. To examine patients with readmissions, we conducted a Chi-squared test of independence to determine whether there was a relationship between fracture type and readmission rates, revealing a significant association (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pelvis fractures had the highest readmission rates, while Tibia-Diaphyseal and Tibia-Distal fractures were more prone to infections, highlighting the need for enhanced infection control strategies. Femur fractures showed moderate readmission and infection rates, indicating a mixed risk profile. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the importance of fracture-specific rehabilitation strategies, focusing on infection prevention and individualized treatment plans to optimize recovery outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-8178b3cb37e34ff1aa11483f9ef6341a
institution Kabale University
issn 2306-5354
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj-art-8178b3cb37e34ff1aa11483f9ef6341a2025-01-24T13:23:09ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-01-011216710.3390/bioengineering12010067Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis VariablesMostafa Rezapour0Rachel B. Seymour1Suman Medda2Stephen H. Sims3Madhav A. Karunakar4Nahir Habet5Metin Nafi Gurcan6Center for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28210, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28210, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28210, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28210, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28210, USACenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USAIn a prospective study, we examined the recovery trajectory of patients with lower extremity fractures to better understand the healing process in the absence of complications. Using a chest-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) device for gait analysis and collecting patient-reported outcome measures, we focused on 12 key gait variables, including Mean Leg Lift Acceleration, Stance Time, and Body Orientation. We employed a linear mixed model (LMM) to analyze these variables over time, incorporating both fixed and random effects to account for individual differences and the time since injury. This model also adjusted for varying intervals between assessments. Our study provided insights into gait recovery across different fracture types using data from 318 patients who experienced no complications or readmissions during their recovery. Through LMM analysis, we found that Tibia-Distal fractures demonstrated the fastest recovery, particularly in terms of mobility and strength. Tibia-Proximal fractures showed balanced improvements in both mobility and stability, suggesting that rehabilitation should target both strength and balance. Femur fractures exhibited varied recovery, with Diaphyseal fractures showing clear improvements in stability, while Distal fractures reflected gains in limb strength but with some variability in stability. To examine patients with readmissions, we conducted a Chi-squared test of independence to determine whether there was a relationship between fracture type and readmission rates, revealing a significant association (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pelvis fractures had the highest readmission rates, while Tibia-Diaphyseal and Tibia-Distal fractures were more prone to infections, highlighting the need for enhanced infection control strategies. Femur fractures showed moderate readmission and infection rates, indicating a mixed risk profile. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the importance of fracture-specific rehabilitation strategies, focusing on infection prevention and individualized treatment plans to optimize recovery outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/67gait analysisrecovery trajectorylower extremity fractureslinear mixed models (LMM)
spellingShingle Mostafa Rezapour
Rachel B. Seymour
Suman Medda
Stephen H. Sims
Madhav A. Karunakar
Nahir Habet
Metin Nafi Gurcan
Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
Bioengineering
gait analysis
recovery trajectory
lower extremity fractures
linear mixed models (LMM)
title Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
title_full Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
title_fullStr Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
title_short Analyzing Gait Dynamics and Recovery Trajectory in Lower Extremity Fractures Using Linear Mixed Models and Gait Analysis Variables
title_sort analyzing gait dynamics and recovery trajectory in lower extremity fractures using linear mixed models and gait analysis variables
topic gait analysis
recovery trajectory
lower extremity fractures
linear mixed models (LMM)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/67
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafarezapour analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT rachelbseymour analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT sumanmedda analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT stephenhsims analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT madhavakarunakar analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT nahirhabet analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables
AT metinnafigurcan analyzinggaitdynamicsandrecoverytrajectoryinlowerextremityfracturesusinglinearmixedmodelsandgaitanalysisvariables