Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study
BackgroundMental health issues represent a prevalent challenge for employees and their employers, leading to substantial impacts on individuals, society, and the economy. Different employee mental health programs (EMHPs) can support employees in preventing and treating mental...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Human Factors |
| Online Access: | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e65750 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850281699869458432 |
|---|---|
| author | Benedict Sevov Robin Huettemann Maximillian Zinner Sven Meister Leonard Fehring |
| author_facet | Benedict Sevov Robin Huettemann Maximillian Zinner Sven Meister Leonard Fehring |
| author_sort | Benedict Sevov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundMental health issues represent a prevalent challenge for employees and their employers, leading to substantial impacts on individuals, society, and the economy. Different employee mental health programs (EMHPs) can support employees in preventing and treating mental health issues. However, the impact of such EMHPs depends largely on the use behavior of employees.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to gain deeper insights into employees’ attitude and use behavior regarding EMHPs by investigating (1) employee preference and intention to use EMHPs, (2) factors that predict use, and (3) key facilitators and barriers influencing use.
MethodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods approach was applied, including a scoping review, qualitative interviews, and a quantitative web-based survey. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees to gain insights into EMHPs from the employee perspective and inform the creation of a web-based questionnaire. The quantitative web-based survey was conducted to collect representative primary data on employees’ perspectives on different EMHPs using 7-point Likert scales. The collected quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, including repeated measures ANOVAs and chi-square tests.
ResultsThe final sample of the web-based survey consisted of 1134 participants and was representative across several sociodemographic characteristics. Analysis of the sample revealed that when given the choice, employees preferred digital (n=666, 58.73%) and self-intervention (n=590, 52.03%) EMHPs. Employees were most likely to use EMHPs focused on prevention (mean 4.89, SD 1.61). Intention to use EMHPs was predicted by age (young: mean 4.59, SD 1.2; old: mean 4.19, SD 1.4; P<.001; Cohen d=0.32), education (academic degree: mean 4.68, SD 1.24; no academic degree: mean 4.26, SD 1.32; P<.001; Cohen d=0.32), and mostly by company culture (positive company culture: mean 4.61, SD 1.27; negative company culture: mean 3.99, SD 1.27; P<.001; Cohen d=0.49). Cost coverage (n=345, 30.42%) and ease of use (n=337, 29.72%) were critical facilitators of use.
ConclusionsEmployers can have a positive contribution to employee mental health by starting to offer EMHPs, preferably digital self-intervention programs for prevention; creating and maintaining the right work environment and culture; and ensuring cost coverage for the EMHP. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-817009d7b71c4aff957a7df44a063fc2 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2292-9495 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Human Factors |
| spelling | doaj-art-817009d7b71c4aff957a7df44a063fc22025-08-20T01:48:12ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Human Factors2292-94952025-05-0112e6575010.2196/65750Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods StudyBenedict Sevovhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-2959-2394Robin Huettemannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-3029Maximillian Zinnerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-6113Sven Meisterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-986XLeonard Fehringhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-3724 BackgroundMental health issues represent a prevalent challenge for employees and their employers, leading to substantial impacts on individuals, society, and the economy. Different employee mental health programs (EMHPs) can support employees in preventing and treating mental health issues. However, the impact of such EMHPs depends largely on the use behavior of employees. ObjectiveThis study aimed to gain deeper insights into employees’ attitude and use behavior regarding EMHPs by investigating (1) employee preference and intention to use EMHPs, (2) factors that predict use, and (3) key facilitators and barriers influencing use. MethodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods approach was applied, including a scoping review, qualitative interviews, and a quantitative web-based survey. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees to gain insights into EMHPs from the employee perspective and inform the creation of a web-based questionnaire. The quantitative web-based survey was conducted to collect representative primary data on employees’ perspectives on different EMHPs using 7-point Likert scales. The collected quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, including repeated measures ANOVAs and chi-square tests. ResultsThe final sample of the web-based survey consisted of 1134 participants and was representative across several sociodemographic characteristics. Analysis of the sample revealed that when given the choice, employees preferred digital (n=666, 58.73%) and self-intervention (n=590, 52.03%) EMHPs. Employees were most likely to use EMHPs focused on prevention (mean 4.89, SD 1.61). Intention to use EMHPs was predicted by age (young: mean 4.59, SD 1.2; old: mean 4.19, SD 1.4; P<.001; Cohen d=0.32), education (academic degree: mean 4.68, SD 1.24; no academic degree: mean 4.26, SD 1.32; P<.001; Cohen d=0.32), and mostly by company culture (positive company culture: mean 4.61, SD 1.27; negative company culture: mean 3.99, SD 1.27; P<.001; Cohen d=0.49). Cost coverage (n=345, 30.42%) and ease of use (n=337, 29.72%) were critical facilitators of use. ConclusionsEmployers can have a positive contribution to employee mental health by starting to offer EMHPs, preferably digital self-intervention programs for prevention; creating and maintaining the right work environment and culture; and ensuring cost coverage for the EMHP.https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e65750 |
| spellingShingle | Benedict Sevov Robin Huettemann Maximillian Zinner Sven Meister Leonard Fehring Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study JMIR Human Factors |
| title | Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full | Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_fullStr | Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_short | Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_sort | employee preference and use of employee mental health programs mixed methods study |
| url | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e65750 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benedictsevov employeepreferenceanduseofemployeementalhealthprogramsmixedmethodsstudy AT robinhuettemann employeepreferenceanduseofemployeementalhealthprogramsmixedmethodsstudy AT maximillianzinner employeepreferenceanduseofemployeementalhealthprogramsmixedmethodsstudy AT svenmeister employeepreferenceanduseofemployeementalhealthprogramsmixedmethodsstudy AT leonardfehring employeepreferenceanduseofemployeementalhealthprogramsmixedmethodsstudy |