Changes in Soil Physical Properties and Maize Productivity in Response to Nitrogen Substitution by Maize Stover for Mineral Fertilizers

Chronic overapplication of inorganic fertilizers decreases crop yields and water use efficiency (WUE). This study aimed to assess the impact of substituting inorganic fertilizer with nitrogen supplied from maize stover (S) on soil physical properties, WUE, maize yield, and economic benefits. The tre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaojuan Wang, Enke Liu, Lei Wang, Pengfei Lv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/3/587
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Chronic overapplication of inorganic fertilizers decreases crop yields and water use efficiency (WUE). This study aimed to assess the impact of substituting inorganic fertilizer with nitrogen supplied from maize stover (S) on soil physical properties, WUE, maize yield, and economic benefits. The treatments were the replacement of 0% (full rate of inorganic fertilizer, FF), 25% (S<sub>25</sub>), 50% (S<sub>50</sub>), 75% (S<sub>75</sub>), and 100% (S<sub>100</sub>) of the standard rate of 225 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> inorganic nitrogen fertilizer with equal amounts of maize stover nitrogen fertilizer. From 2016 to 2019, the experiment was performed on the Loess Plateau in China. S<sub>100</sub> notably reduced soil bulk density by 6.11% relative to FF in the fourth year (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Replacement treatments (S<sub>25</sub>, S<sub>50</sub>, S<sub>75</sub>, and S<sub>100</sub>) increased soil water storage following maize harvest, enhanced net benefits over four years, and significantly reduced evapotranspiration by 5.69–11.08% in the first three years (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). The maize yield of the alternative treatments was found to be significantly greater than that of FF by 7.76–18.30% in the fourth year (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). With the increasing straw application rate, soil moisture and maize yield decreased, whereas evapotranspiration and net benefits increased. In the principal component analysis, S<sub>25</sub> was found to have the highest comprehensive evaluation score. Therefore, the S<sub>25</sub> treatment was the optimal fertilization pattern.
ISSN:2073-4395