Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.

Quality improvement approaches are increasingly being used to address the problem of healthcare's climate and ecological impact. While sustainability is increasingly recognized as a domain of quality, consensus is lacking on the most appropriate measures and metrics for those looking to reduce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colin Sue-Chue-Lam, Sezgi Yanikomeroglu, Doulia Hamad, Brian Wong, Karen Born
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309417
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540121126141952
author Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
Sezgi Yanikomeroglu
Doulia Hamad
Brian Wong
Karen Born
author_facet Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
Sezgi Yanikomeroglu
Doulia Hamad
Brian Wong
Karen Born
author_sort Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
collection DOAJ
description Quality improvement approaches are increasingly being used to address the problem of healthcare's climate and ecological impact. While sustainability is increasingly recognized as a domain of quality, consensus is lacking on the most appropriate measures and metrics for those looking to reduce ecological impacts through quality improvement initiatives. We propose a scoping review to summarize approaches for selecting and quantifying ecological impacts in the published quality improvement literature. We will search multiple electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from 2000 onwards, to identify published quality improvement initiatives in the human healthcare setting intended to address ecological impact with at least one quantitative measure of ecological impact, such as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas. Two independent reviewers working in parallel will screen studies for inclusion and abstract study data, including publication, study, and ecological impact characteristics. Charted data will be synthesized narratively as well as with descriptive tables, figures, and summary statistics. In doing so, we will map areas of relative focus as well as gaps in the measurement of ecological impact across quality improvement initiatives. This map can in turn be used to raise awareness of ecological impacts requiring broader consideration, encouraging holistic and clinically relevant approaches to measuring ecological impact in future quality improvement work.
format Article
id doaj-art-80de716194a94b2fa9c8aee26af151b0
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-80de716194a94b2fa9c8aee26af151b02025-02-05T05:32:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01198e030941710.1371/journal.pone.0309417Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.Colin Sue-Chue-LamSezgi YanikomerogluDoulia HamadBrian WongKaren BornQuality improvement approaches are increasingly being used to address the problem of healthcare's climate and ecological impact. While sustainability is increasingly recognized as a domain of quality, consensus is lacking on the most appropriate measures and metrics for those looking to reduce ecological impacts through quality improvement initiatives. We propose a scoping review to summarize approaches for selecting and quantifying ecological impacts in the published quality improvement literature. We will search multiple electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from 2000 onwards, to identify published quality improvement initiatives in the human healthcare setting intended to address ecological impact with at least one quantitative measure of ecological impact, such as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas. Two independent reviewers working in parallel will screen studies for inclusion and abstract study data, including publication, study, and ecological impact characteristics. Charted data will be synthesized narratively as well as with descriptive tables, figures, and summary statistics. In doing so, we will map areas of relative focus as well as gaps in the measurement of ecological impact across quality improvement initiatives. This map can in turn be used to raise awareness of ecological impacts requiring broader consideration, encouraging holistic and clinically relevant approaches to measuring ecological impact in future quality improvement work.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309417
spellingShingle Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
Sezgi Yanikomeroglu
Doulia Hamad
Brian Wong
Karen Born
Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
PLoS ONE
title Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
title_full Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
title_fullStr Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
title_full_unstemmed Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
title_short Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: A scoping review protocol.
title_sort metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare a scoping review protocol
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309417
work_keys_str_mv AT colinsuechuelam metricsusedinqualityimprovementpublicationsaddressingenvironmentalsustainabilityinhealthcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT sezgiyanikomeroglu metricsusedinqualityimprovementpublicationsaddressingenvironmentalsustainabilityinhealthcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT douliahamad metricsusedinqualityimprovementpublicationsaddressingenvironmentalsustainabilityinhealthcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT brianwong metricsusedinqualityimprovementpublicationsaddressingenvironmentalsustainabilityinhealthcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT karenborn metricsusedinqualityimprovementpublicationsaddressingenvironmentalsustainabilityinhealthcareascopingreviewprotocol