Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison
Background. The ceramics industry produces porcelain pastes using a controlled ratio of water and porcelain powder. Two methods are used to produce a dental porcelain paste: one-step mixing or incremental mixing. Objective. To evaluate the optical properties of a feldspathic dental ceramic using two...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6666931 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849410080151175168 |
|---|---|
| author | Catalina Serna-Meneses Gabriel Ocampo-Parra Santiago Arango-Santander Claudia Garcia-Garcia Luis Felipe Restrepo-Tamayo Johnatan Cardona-Jimenez Alexander Ossa Alejandro Pelaez-Vargas |
| author_facet | Catalina Serna-Meneses Gabriel Ocampo-Parra Santiago Arango-Santander Claudia Garcia-Garcia Luis Felipe Restrepo-Tamayo Johnatan Cardona-Jimenez Alexander Ossa Alejandro Pelaez-Vargas |
| author_sort | Catalina Serna-Meneses |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. The ceramics industry produces porcelain pastes using a controlled ratio of water and porcelain powder. Two methods are used to produce a dental porcelain paste: one-step mixing or incremental mixing. Objective. To evaluate the optical properties of a feldspathic dental ceramic using two different ceramic paste preparation methods using a Bayesian approach. Materials and Methods. Two groups of feldspathic porcelain discs, an incremental mixing group (n = 40) and a one-step mixing group (n = 40), were assessed. Groups were evaluated using spectrophotometry, and the translucency parameter (TP) of each sample was calculated. Surfaces were characterized by AFM and SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a Bayesian approach. Results. Translucency parameter values of the incremental mixing group ranged from 1.65 to 3.41, while values for the one-step mixing group ranged from 3.62 to 5.74, this difference being statistically significant. The lowest roughness was obtained on the surface of discs in the one-step mixing group. Conclusions. Feldspathic porcelain with lower translucency and higher roughness was obtained using the incremental mixture method. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-80bbe0e9ee9448c1bc9bd73a356e5bcc |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-80bbe0e9ee9448c1bc9bd73a356e5bcc2025-08-20T03:35:15ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6666931Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian ComparisonCatalina Serna-Meneses0Gabriel Ocampo-Parra1Santiago Arango-Santander2Claudia Garcia-Garcia3Luis Felipe Restrepo-Tamayo4Johnatan Cardona-Jimenez5Alexander Ossa6Alejandro Pelaez-Vargas7Universidad Cooperativa de ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de ColombiaSchool of PhysicsPrivate Practice in ProsthodonticsUniversidade de São PauloProduction Engineering DepartmentUniversidad Cooperativa de ColombiaBackground. The ceramics industry produces porcelain pastes using a controlled ratio of water and porcelain powder. Two methods are used to produce a dental porcelain paste: one-step mixing or incremental mixing. Objective. To evaluate the optical properties of a feldspathic dental ceramic using two different ceramic paste preparation methods using a Bayesian approach. Materials and Methods. Two groups of feldspathic porcelain discs, an incremental mixing group (n = 40) and a one-step mixing group (n = 40), were assessed. Groups were evaluated using spectrophotometry, and the translucency parameter (TP) of each sample was calculated. Surfaces were characterized by AFM and SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a Bayesian approach. Results. Translucency parameter values of the incremental mixing group ranged from 1.65 to 3.41, while values for the one-step mixing group ranged from 3.62 to 5.74, this difference being statistically significant. The lowest roughness was obtained on the surface of discs in the one-step mixing group. Conclusions. Feldspathic porcelain with lower translucency and higher roughness was obtained using the incremental mixture method.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6666931 |
| spellingShingle | Catalina Serna-Meneses Gabriel Ocampo-Parra Santiago Arango-Santander Claudia Garcia-Garcia Luis Felipe Restrepo-Tamayo Johnatan Cardona-Jimenez Alexander Ossa Alejandro Pelaez-Vargas Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison |
| title_full | Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison |
| title_fullStr | Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison |
| title_full_unstemmed | Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison |
| title_short | Translucency of a Dental Porcelain Mixed by Two Ceramic Slurry Methods: A Bayesian Comparison |
| title_sort | translucency of a dental porcelain mixed by two ceramic slurry methods a bayesian comparison |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6666931 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT catalinasernameneses translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT gabrielocampoparra translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT santiagoarangosantander translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT claudiagarciagarcia translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT luisfeliperestrepotamayo translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT johnatancardonajimenez translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT alexanderossa translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison AT alejandropelaezvargas translucencyofadentalporcelainmixedbytwoceramicslurrymethodsabayesiancomparison |