Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise

Background/Aim. Industrial noise is produced in workshops due to factory machinery and tools used in technological processes. It has detrimental effect to primarily the organ of the sense of hearing, thus damaging hearing in oversensitive subjects. The aim of the study was to perform a detailed anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Živić Ljubica, Ignjatović Snežana, Terzić Negra, Jakovljević Vladimir Lj., Živić Danijela, Đonović Nela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade 2010-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501003229Z.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850214591933448192
author Živić Ljubica
Ignjatović Snežana
Terzić Negra
Jakovljević Vladimir Lj.
Živić Danijela
Đonović Nela
author_facet Živić Ljubica
Ignjatović Snežana
Terzić Negra
Jakovljević Vladimir Lj.
Živić Danijela
Đonović Nela
author_sort Živić Ljubica
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aim. Industrial noise is produced in workshops due to factory machinery and tools used in technological processes. It has detrimental effect to primarily the organ of the sense of hearing, thus damaging hearing in oversensitive subjects. The aim of the study was to perform a detailed analysis of audiometric and, especially, impedancemetric parameters in workers exposed to the effects of industrial noise of various duration, as well as to determine similarities and differences in workers with differences in sensitivity to damaging effects of noise. Methods. The study included a homogenous group of 173 industrial workers involved in the same department of a huge workshop named 'Kovačica' exposed to noise level above a threshold intensity, and divided into three groups: the group I of 116 workers (232 ears) exposed to noise for 8 h in the workshop 'Kovačica', the group II of 41 workers (82 ears) exposed to noise only half of the working time, and the group III of 16 workers (32 ears) exposed to the same conditions and having the normal hearing sense. The group III served as a control group. Prior to the study any workers went through a thorough anamnesis and complete ORL examination, and then they were submitted to audiometric testing. The study included only the workers with no hearing damage due to diseases, injuries nor other detrimental factors in order to be sure that the hearing findings had been caused by industrial noise. Results. The results obtained by audiometric testing showed that 90.75% of the workers had hearing damage of various degrees, while 9.25 % of the workers had regular hearing although had been exposed to the same conditions. More severe hearing damage was revealed in the workers of the group I. Tympanometricly, in most ears of the group I workers (65.52%) a compliance value was found to be more than 0.9 cm3, while in the majority of those of the group II (59.75%) a compliance value was in the range from 0.5 to 0.9 cm3. In the workers of the group III with no hearing damage, a compliance value for any ears was in the range from 0.1 to 0.9 cm3. Mean value of threshold reflex (98.56 dB) at 500 Hz and 1 000 Hz in the group I was increased as compared with the group II (95.6 dB) and the group III (84.38 dB). At higher frequencies, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz, threshold reflex was increased in the group I (99.05 dB), and in the group II (97.6 dB) as compared with the group III (86.4 dB). The amplitude of stapedic reflex was lowest in the group I, while mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and at 4 000 Hz were 2.31, 1.38, 1 and 0.3, respectively. In the group II mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz were 2.52, 1.80, 1.30 and 0.5, respectively. In the group III mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and at 4 000 Hz were 2.36, 2.45, 2.5 and 2.08, respectively. By measuring input (rising) and output angles it was revealed that most ears of the workers in the groups I and II had rising angle ranging from 41 to 50o, and in the workers with no hearing loss from 31 to 50o. In the majority of the ears of the groups I and II outlet angle was in the range from 16 to 35o, and in the workers with no hearing damage from 26 to 35o. Conclusion. By audiometric and impedancemetric examinations it was determined that for the sense of hearing it is significant not only a threshold hearing expressed in the audiometric curve at various frequencies, but also a threshold of unpleasantness and pain under higher intensities shown by the occurrence of stapedic reflex. The less hearing field between threshold hearing and threshold acoustic reflex is, the less capabilities of hearing perception due to the occurrence of recruitment.
format Article
id doaj-art-80af72c2def841dcb07ff44134f3c4ea
institution OA Journals
issn 0042-8450
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj-art-80af72c2def841dcb07ff44134f3c4ea2025-08-20T02:08:50ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502010-01-0167322923510.2298/VSP1003229ZComparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noiseŽivić LjubicaIgnjatović SnežanaTerzić NegraJakovljević Vladimir Lj.Živić DanijelaĐonović NelaBackground/Aim. Industrial noise is produced in workshops due to factory machinery and tools used in technological processes. It has detrimental effect to primarily the organ of the sense of hearing, thus damaging hearing in oversensitive subjects. The aim of the study was to perform a detailed analysis of audiometric and, especially, impedancemetric parameters in workers exposed to the effects of industrial noise of various duration, as well as to determine similarities and differences in workers with differences in sensitivity to damaging effects of noise. Methods. The study included a homogenous group of 173 industrial workers involved in the same department of a huge workshop named 'Kovačica' exposed to noise level above a threshold intensity, and divided into three groups: the group I of 116 workers (232 ears) exposed to noise for 8 h in the workshop 'Kovačica', the group II of 41 workers (82 ears) exposed to noise only half of the working time, and the group III of 16 workers (32 ears) exposed to the same conditions and having the normal hearing sense. The group III served as a control group. Prior to the study any workers went through a thorough anamnesis and complete ORL examination, and then they were submitted to audiometric testing. The study included only the workers with no hearing damage due to diseases, injuries nor other detrimental factors in order to be sure that the hearing findings had been caused by industrial noise. Results. The results obtained by audiometric testing showed that 90.75% of the workers had hearing damage of various degrees, while 9.25 % of the workers had regular hearing although had been exposed to the same conditions. More severe hearing damage was revealed in the workers of the group I. Tympanometricly, in most ears of the group I workers (65.52%) a compliance value was found to be more than 0.9 cm3, while in the majority of those of the group II (59.75%) a compliance value was in the range from 0.5 to 0.9 cm3. In the workers of the group III with no hearing damage, a compliance value for any ears was in the range from 0.1 to 0.9 cm3. Mean value of threshold reflex (98.56 dB) at 500 Hz and 1 000 Hz in the group I was increased as compared with the group II (95.6 dB) and the group III (84.38 dB). At higher frequencies, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz, threshold reflex was increased in the group I (99.05 dB), and in the group II (97.6 dB) as compared with the group III (86.4 dB). The amplitude of stapedic reflex was lowest in the group I, while mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and at 4 000 Hz were 2.31, 1.38, 1 and 0.3, respectively. In the group II mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz were 2.52, 1.80, 1.30 and 0.5, respectively. In the group III mean values of amplitude at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and at 4 000 Hz were 2.36, 2.45, 2.5 and 2.08, respectively. By measuring input (rising) and output angles it was revealed that most ears of the workers in the groups I and II had rising angle ranging from 41 to 50o, and in the workers with no hearing loss from 31 to 50o. In the majority of the ears of the groups I and II outlet angle was in the range from 16 to 35o, and in the workers with no hearing damage from 26 to 35o. Conclusion. By audiometric and impedancemetric examinations it was determined that for the sense of hearing it is significant not only a threshold hearing expressed in the audiometric curve at various frequencies, but also a threshold of unpleasantness and pain under higher intensities shown by the occurrence of stapedic reflex. The less hearing field between threshold hearing and threshold acoustic reflex is, the less capabilities of hearing perception due to the occurrence of recruitment.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501003229Z.pdfnoise, occupationalworkplaceaudiometryhearing disordersacoustic impedance test
spellingShingle Živić Ljubica
Ignjatović Snežana
Terzić Negra
Jakovljević Vladimir Lj.
Živić Danijela
Đonović Nela
Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
noise, occupational
workplace
audiometry
hearing disorders
acoustic impedance test
title Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
title_full Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
title_short Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
title_sort comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise
topic noise, occupational
workplace
audiometry
hearing disorders
acoustic impedance test
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501003229Z.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zivicljubica comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise
AT ignjatovicsnezana comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise
AT terzicnegra comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise
AT jakovljevicvladimirlj comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise
AT zivicdanijela comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise
AT đonovicnela comparativeanalysisofaudiometricandimpedancemetricfindingsinworkersexposedtotheeffectsofvariousdurationindustrialnoise