Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium

The aim of this study was to determine the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) to penicillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin (high level), streptomycin (high level), oxytetracycline, chloramphenicol, rifampin, erythromycin, ciprofl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirović Veljko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade 2002-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2002/0042-84500205499M.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849736973199081472
author Mirović Veljko
author_facet Mirović Veljko
author_sort Mirović Veljko
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to determine the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) to penicillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin (high level), streptomycin (high level), oxytetracycline, chloramphenicol, rifampin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and nitrofurantoin from clinical specimens during 1999. The resistance of enterococci to antibiotics was determined by disk diffusion and dilution methods according to the American National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. The production of β-lactamase was determined by nitrocefin disks. In E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates (n=111 and n=48) the frequency of the resistance to both penicillins was 0.9% and 89.6%, respectively. All enterococci isolates were β-lactamase negative. Only one strain of E. faecium was vancomycin resistant (Van A fenotype). Among E. faecalis isolates (n=109) high level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), high level streptomycin resistance (HLSR), and resistance to both agents was 52.3%, 50.4%, and 43.7%, respectively. Among E. faecium isolates (n=48) HLGR, HLSR, and to both agents were 68.7%, 75%, and 62.5% respectively. The majority of E. faecium isolates were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin. E. faecalis remained susceptible to penicillins. Moreover, there was a very high incidence of enterococci resistant to high level aminoglycosides.
format Article
id doaj-art-809f76b3f66349eeb8b7b60bf86ef7bf
institution DOAJ
issn 0042-8450
language English
publishDate 2002-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj-art-809f76b3f66349eeb8b7b60bf86ef7bf2025-08-20T03:07:06ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502002-01-0159549950610.2298/VSP0205499MAntibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faeciumMirović VeljkoThe aim of this study was to determine the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) to penicillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin (high level), streptomycin (high level), oxytetracycline, chloramphenicol, rifampin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and nitrofurantoin from clinical specimens during 1999. The resistance of enterococci to antibiotics was determined by disk diffusion and dilution methods according to the American National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. The production of β-lactamase was determined by nitrocefin disks. In E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates (n=111 and n=48) the frequency of the resistance to both penicillins was 0.9% and 89.6%, respectively. All enterococci isolates were β-lactamase negative. Only one strain of E. faecium was vancomycin resistant (Van A fenotype). Among E. faecalis isolates (n=109) high level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), high level streptomycin resistance (HLSR), and resistance to both agents was 52.3%, 50.4%, and 43.7%, respectively. Among E. faecium isolates (n=48) HLGR, HLSR, and to both agents were 68.7%, 75%, and 62.5% respectively. The majority of E. faecium isolates were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin. E. faecalis remained susceptible to penicillins. Moreover, there was a very high incidence of enterococci resistant to high level aminoglycosides.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2002/0042-84500205499M.pdfdrug resistance, microbialEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumanti-infective agentshospitals
spellingShingle Mirović Veljko
Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
drug resistance, microbial
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecium
anti-infective agents
hospitals
title Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
title_full Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
title_fullStr Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
title_short Antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
title_sort antibiotic resistance of hospital strains of enterococcus faecalis and enterococcus faecium
topic drug resistance, microbial
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecium
anti-infective agents
hospitals
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2002/0042-84500205499M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mirovicveljko antibioticresistanceofhospitalstrainsofenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaecium