RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME

Aim. To evaluate early and long-term results of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and different anatomy of renal arter-ies as compared to those who underwent a conser-vative treatment.Materials and Methods. We recruited 53 con-secutive patients with resistant hyperte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TATIANA Y. Chichkova, SERGEY E. Mamchur, MARIA P. Romanova, EGOR A. Khomenko, ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Kemerovo State Medical University 2018-12-01
Series:Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/114
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064902307184640
author TATIANA Y. Chichkova
SERGEY E. Mamchur
MARIA P. Romanova
EGOR A. Khomenko
ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov
author_facet TATIANA Y. Chichkova
SERGEY E. Mamchur
MARIA P. Romanova
EGOR A. Khomenko
ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov
author_sort TATIANA Y. Chichkova
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To evaluate early and long-term results of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and different anatomy of renal arter-ies as compared to those who underwent a conser-vative treatment.Materials and Methods. We recruited 53 con-secutive patients with resistant hypertension (25 males and 28 females, median age 54 (interquartile range 43-66) years). Depending on the anatomy of renal arteries defined by non-invasive visualization, patients who underwent renal denervation were as-signed into the subgroups with typical anatomy (A1 and A2) and with multiple arteries (B1 and B2). Pa-tients with complex renal anatomy unacceptable for the surgery or those who refused to undergo renal denervation received conservative therapy. Evalua-tion of blood pressure (BP) was performed at the baseline and upon 12 months of follow-up.Results. Patients with typical anatomy of renal arteries were characterized by significant decrease in mean BP as well as its variability (from 20 to 11 mmHg and from 17 to 10 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). Index of BP time de-creased from 100 to 25% for systolic BP and from 90 to 45% for diastolic BP (р < 0.05). Similar dy-namics were revealed in the B1 subgroup (all arter-ies available for ablation) of patients with multiple arteries. In the B2 subgroup (≥ 1 artery unavail-able for ablation) office and 24-hour BP decreased significantly from 165/95 to 155/90 mmHg (р ≤ 0.05), and mean systolic BP also decreased from 165 to 150 mmHg (p = 0.04). Patients with com-plete renal denervation (A1 + B1) were character-ized by a significant reduction of mean systolic BP (25 mmHg) as compared to those with incomplete renal denervation (10 mmHg) or conservative therapy (1 mmHg).Conclusions. The long-term efficacy of renal denervation was superior to conservative therapy in BP reduction, its variability and time index re-gardless of the anatomy of renal arteries. However, BP reduction in patients with incomplete denervation was less pronounced.
format Article
id doaj-art-809a39d991264e55a77d341fd4fed521
institution DOAJ
issn 2500-0764
2542-0941
language Russian
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Kemerovo State Medical University
record_format Article
series Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
spelling doaj-art-809a39d991264e55a77d341fd4fed5212025-08-20T02:49:09ZrusKemerovo State Medical UniversityФундаментальная и клиническая медицина2500-07642542-09412018-12-01342231113RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOMETATIANA Y. Chichkova0SERGEY E. Mamchur1MARIA P. Romanova2EGOR A. Khomenko3ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov4Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesOmsk Cardiology DispensaryAim. To evaluate early and long-term results of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and different anatomy of renal arter-ies as compared to those who underwent a conser-vative treatment.Materials and Methods. We recruited 53 con-secutive patients with resistant hypertension (25 males and 28 females, median age 54 (interquartile range 43-66) years). Depending on the anatomy of renal arteries defined by non-invasive visualization, patients who underwent renal denervation were as-signed into the subgroups with typical anatomy (A1 and A2) and with multiple arteries (B1 and B2). Pa-tients with complex renal anatomy unacceptable for the surgery or those who refused to undergo renal denervation received conservative therapy. Evalua-tion of blood pressure (BP) was performed at the baseline and upon 12 months of follow-up.Results. Patients with typical anatomy of renal arteries were characterized by significant decrease in mean BP as well as its variability (from 20 to 11 mmHg and from 17 to 10 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). Index of BP time de-creased from 100 to 25% for systolic BP and from 90 to 45% for diastolic BP (р < 0.05). Similar dy-namics were revealed in the B1 subgroup (all arter-ies available for ablation) of patients with multiple arteries. In the B2 subgroup (≥ 1 artery unavail-able for ablation) office and 24-hour BP decreased significantly from 165/95 to 155/90 mmHg (р ≤ 0.05), and mean systolic BP also decreased from 165 to 150 mmHg (p = 0.04). Patients with com-plete renal denervation (A1 + B1) were character-ized by a significant reduction of mean systolic BP (25 mmHg) as compared to those with incomplete renal denervation (10 mmHg) or conservative therapy (1 mmHg).Conclusions. The long-term efficacy of renal denervation was superior to conservative therapy in BP reduction, its variability and time index re-gardless of the anatomy of renal arteries. However, BP reduction in patients with incomplete denervation was less pronounced.https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/114резистентная артериальная гипертензияренальная денервацияresistant arterial hypertensionrenal denervation
spellingShingle TATIANA Y. Chichkova
SERGEY E. Mamchur
MARIA P. Romanova
EGOR A. Khomenko
ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov
RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
резистентная артериальная гипертензия
ренальная денервация
resistant arterial hypertension
renal denervation
title RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
title_full RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
title_fullStr RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
title_full_unstemmed RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
title_short RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME
title_sort renal denervation impact of anatomy on procedure outcome
topic резистентная артериальная гипертензия
ренальная денервация
resistant arterial hypertension
renal denervation
url https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/114
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianaychichkova renaldenervationimpactofanatomyonprocedureoutcome
AT sergeyemamchur renaldenervationimpactofanatomyonprocedureoutcome
AT mariapromanova renaldenervationimpactofanatomyonprocedureoutcome
AT egorakhomenko renaldenervationimpactofanatomyonprocedureoutcome
AT alexandryivanov renaldenervationimpactofanatomyonprocedureoutcome