Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach
Structuralism and poststructuralism are two of the most important and influential approaches in the humanities of the 20th century. These two approaches are raised in response to the special situation in philosophy and humanities, so they have to be paid attention to. The main question of this artic...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5316_80256b96a71d36401a61a6ddcbfe3c09.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555249316233216 |
|---|---|
| author | Mostafa Dashti Ahangar |
| author_facet | Mostafa Dashti Ahangar |
| author_sort | Mostafa Dashti Ahangar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Structuralism and poststructuralism are two of the most important and influential approaches in the humanities of the 20th century. These two approaches are raised in response to the special situation in philosophy and humanities, so they have to be paid attention to. The main question of this article is to survey of benefits and weaknesses in this book by the critical, descriptive method. It should be noted that this study was conducted in accordance with structuralist and poststructuralist theories, and this book has been studied in three phases: Methodological, formal, and content review phase. The books in this field, usually, are translated into the Persian language, but this book is an essay, so the purpose of this article is to review this book as an essay book. The most important value of this book is the novelty of the subject. Also, this book has its drawbacks of writing issues and punctuation. Great emphasis on philosophical issues, the extension of the opinion of structuralists and poststructuralists in different contexts of humanities, failure to the presentation of historical philosophy content properly, redundant repetition and inconsistency, are the other flaws in the book include. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8086aa1097e046e8abb8464b8bfc08de |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-8086aa1097e046e8abb8464b8bfc08de2025-01-08T05:47:50ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502020-06-0120418120410.30465/crtls.2020.53165316Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical ApproachMostafa Dashti Ahangar0Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Velayat UniversityStructuralism and poststructuralism are two of the most important and influential approaches in the humanities of the 20th century. These two approaches are raised in response to the special situation in philosophy and humanities, so they have to be paid attention to. The main question of this article is to survey of benefits and weaknesses in this book by the critical, descriptive method. It should be noted that this study was conducted in accordance with structuralist and poststructuralist theories, and this book has been studied in three phases: Methodological, formal, and content review phase. The books in this field, usually, are translated into the Persian language, but this book is an essay, so the purpose of this article is to review this book as an essay book. The most important value of this book is the novelty of the subject. Also, this book has its drawbacks of writing issues and punctuation. Great emphasis on philosophical issues, the extension of the opinion of structuralists and poststructuralists in different contexts of humanities, failure to the presentation of historical philosophy content properly, redundant repetition and inconsistency, are the other flaws in the book include.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5316_80256b96a71d36401a61a6ddcbfe3c09.pdfstructuralismpoststructuralismdeconstructiongeneral linguisticsphilosophical |
| spellingShingle | Mostafa Dashti Ahangar Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی structuralism poststructuralism deconstruction general linguistics philosophical |
| title | Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach |
| title_full | Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach |
| title_fullStr | Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach |
| title_short | Criticism and Analysis of the Book Structuralism and Post-Structuralism, a Philosophical Approach |
| title_sort | criticism and analysis of the book structuralism and post structuralism a philosophical approach |
| topic | structuralism poststructuralism deconstruction general linguistics philosophical |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5316_80256b96a71d36401a61a6ddcbfe3c09.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mostafadashtiahangar criticismandanalysisofthebookstructuralismandpoststructuralismaphilosophicalapproach |