COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING

"One of the innovative inventions in dentistry is the digital scanner, which, based on the predictions, will significantly change the course of future treatments for patients, dentists and dental technicians. Objective: The aim of our study is to compare the dimensional differences between den...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krisztina Martha, Mariana Pacurar, Esztella Éva Kiss, Brigitta Szakacs, Izabella Éva Mureșan, Manuela Popescu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation 2025-06-01
Series:Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://rjor.ro/comparative-morphometric-study-between-conventional-and-digital-impression-taking/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849230238038360064
author Krisztina Martha
Mariana Pacurar
Esztella Éva Kiss
Brigitta Szakacs
Izabella Éva Mureșan
Manuela Popescu
author_facet Krisztina Martha
Mariana Pacurar
Esztella Éva Kiss
Brigitta Szakacs
Izabella Éva Mureșan
Manuela Popescu
author_sort Krisztina Martha
collection DOAJ
description "One of the innovative inventions in dentistry is the digital scanner, which, based on the predictions, will significantly change the course of future treatments for patients, dentists and dental technicians. Objective: The aim of our study is to compare the dimensional differences between dental arches registered using the traditional and digital methods. Materials and method: We compared the digitally scanned versions of study samples (15 cases) based on alginate impressions with the intraoral scans of the same patients. The study samples were scanned with a Medit Identical Hybrid scanner, while the intraoral scans were performed with a 3Shape scanner. After all this, the impressions of each subject taken with different techniques were placed in each other using the Exocad program, and the dimensional differences were examined in different planes. Result: Our measurements are still in progress. Conclusion: Regarding our expectations, a difference between analog and digital methods is expected, as the former almost entirely depends on the person performing the experiment and its subject, while the latter can be considered more precise due to its more objective operating principle."
format Article
id doaj-art-805f4df9bb7745cd9d328da366402651
institution Kabale University
issn 2066-7000
2601-4661
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation
record_format Article
series Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-805f4df9bb7745cd9d328da3664026512025-08-21T07:50:33ZengRomanian Society of Oral RehabilitationRomanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2066-70002601-46612025-06-0117288889410.62610/RJOR.2025.2.17.81COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKINGKrisztina Martha0Mariana Pacurar1Esztella Éva Kiss2Brigitta Szakacs3Izabella Éva Mureșan4Manuela Popescu5Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, RomaniaOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, RomaniaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania"Fixed Prosthetics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania"Fixed Prosthetics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, RomaniaOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, UMF Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania"One of the innovative inventions in dentistry is the digital scanner, which, based on the predictions, will significantly change the course of future treatments for patients, dentists and dental technicians. Objective: The aim of our study is to compare the dimensional differences between dental arches registered using the traditional and digital methods. Materials and method: We compared the digitally scanned versions of study samples (15 cases) based on alginate impressions with the intraoral scans of the same patients. The study samples were scanned with a Medit Identical Hybrid scanner, while the intraoral scans were performed with a 3Shape scanner. After all this, the impressions of each subject taken with different techniques were placed in each other using the Exocad program, and the dimensional differences were examined in different planes. Result: Our measurements are still in progress. Conclusion: Regarding our expectations, a difference between analog and digital methods is expected, as the former almost entirely depends on the person performing the experiment and its subject, while the latter can be considered more precise due to its more objective operating principle." https://rjor.ro/comparative-morphometric-study-between-conventional-and-digital-impression-taking/
spellingShingle Krisztina Martha
Mariana Pacurar
Esztella Éva Kiss
Brigitta Szakacs
Izabella Éva Mureșan
Manuela Popescu
COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
title COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
title_full COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
title_short COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION-TAKING
title_sort comparative morphometric study between conventional and digital impression taking
url https://rjor.ro/comparative-morphometric-study-between-conventional-and-digital-impression-taking/
work_keys_str_mv AT krisztinamartha comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking
AT marianapacurar comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking
AT esztellaevakiss comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking
AT brigittaszakacs comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking
AT izabellaevamuresan comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking
AT manuelapopescu comparativemorphometricstudybetweenconventionalanddigitalimpressiontaking