Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments

This article deals with teachers’ professional development, focusing specifically on their competencies to assess learning. Research in this field has shown a lack of instruments for measuring such competencies in practicing teachers. In this context, we present the validation process of such an ins...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Miguel Olave Astorga, Félix González-Carrasco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/5/624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850126913729724416
author José Miguel Olave Astorga
Félix González-Carrasco
author_facet José Miguel Olave Astorga
Félix González-Carrasco
author_sort José Miguel Olave Astorga
collection DOAJ
description This article deals with teachers’ professional development, focusing specifically on their competencies to assess learning. Research in this field has shown a lack of instruments for measuring such competencies in practicing teachers. In this context, we present the validation process of such an instrument, called Classroom Evaluative Judgment, which is designed to assess teachers’ competencies in evaluating their students’ school work. We adopt a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental and sequential design. First, the instrument was subjected to content validation through expert judgment. Subsequently, a pilot test was carried out with an unintentional sample, applying statistical reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to ensure the internal consistency of the instrument with respect to its theoretical basis. Finally, we validated the instrument with 266 participants, obtaining high levels of internal consistency and statistical reliability. The results support the soundness of the proposed model and its usefulness for measuring professional teaching competencies in the field of learning assessment. Its application in real contexts of professional practice could open new lines of research on the evaluative judgment of teachers and the strengthening of their evaluative identity.
format Article
id doaj-art-7fada3f07dad450f803c7022e4474f4d
institution OA Journals
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj-art-7fada3f07dad450f803c7022e4474f4d2025-08-20T02:33:48ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-05-0115562410.3390/educsci15050624Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning AssessmentsJosé Miguel Olave Astorga0Félix González-Carrasco1Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, ChileFacultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, ChileThis article deals with teachers’ professional development, focusing specifically on their competencies to assess learning. Research in this field has shown a lack of instruments for measuring such competencies in practicing teachers. In this context, we present the validation process of such an instrument, called Classroom Evaluative Judgment, which is designed to assess teachers’ competencies in evaluating their students’ school work. We adopt a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental and sequential design. First, the instrument was subjected to content validation through expert judgment. Subsequently, a pilot test was carried out with an unintentional sample, applying statistical reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to ensure the internal consistency of the instrument with respect to its theoretical basis. Finally, we validated the instrument with 266 participants, obtaining high levels of internal consistency and statistical reliability. The results support the soundness of the proposed model and its usefulness for measuring professional teaching competencies in the field of learning assessment. Its application in real contexts of professional practice could open new lines of research on the evaluative judgment of teachers and the strengthening of their evaluative identity.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/5/624learning assessmentteachers’ professional developmentevaluative identityinstrument validation
spellingShingle José Miguel Olave Astorga
Félix González-Carrasco
Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
Education Sciences
learning assessment
teachers’ professional development
evaluative identity
instrument validation
title Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
title_full Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
title_fullStr Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
title_short Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments
title_sort evaluative judgment a validation process to measure teachers professional competencies in learning assessments
topic learning assessment
teachers’ professional development
evaluative identity
instrument validation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/5/624
work_keys_str_mv AT josemiguelolaveastorga evaluativejudgmentavalidationprocesstomeasureteachersprofessionalcompetenciesinlearningassessments
AT felixgonzalezcarrasco evaluativejudgmentavalidationprocesstomeasureteachersprofessionalcompetenciesinlearningassessments