Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer

ABSTRACT Background The clinical implications of different EML4‐ALK fusion variants remain poorly elucidated in the era of second‐generation ALK inhibitors. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study, wherein patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer harbor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zihua Zou, Lige Wu, Xuezhi Hao, Yan Li, Li Liang, Yangchun Gu, Jianming Ying, Junling Li, Puyuan Xing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70000
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576766418354176
author Zihua Zou
Lige Wu
Xuezhi Hao
Yan Li
Li Liang
Yangchun Gu
Jianming Ying
Junling Li
Puyuan Xing
author_facet Zihua Zou
Lige Wu
Xuezhi Hao
Yan Li
Li Liang
Yangchun Gu
Jianming Ying
Junling Li
Puyuan Xing
author_sort Zihua Zou
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background The clinical implications of different EML4‐ALK fusion variants remain poorly elucidated in the era of second‐generation ALK inhibitors. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study, wherein patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer harboring EML4‐ALK fusion were stratified into two cohorts based on their first‐line treatment: Cohort 1 received alectinib, while Cohort 2 received crizotinib. Statistical analysis was employed to investigate the impact of different EML4‐ALK variants and TP53 status on the efficacy of first‐line ALK‐TKIs. Results Finally, 49 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and 53 patients in cohort 2. In cohort 1, patients with long EML4‐ALK fusion variants exhibited prolonged PFS (NR vs. 34.0 m, p = 0.004, HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12–0.74) and an elevated 5‐year OS rate (93.3% vs. 68.4%, p = 0.020, HR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.62) compared to those with short variants. The median PFS was not reached in TP53‐wt group and 47.0 m in TP53‐mut group (p = 0.087, HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17–1.17). The TP53‐wt group exhibited a superior 5‐year OS rate (100% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.030) compared to TP53‐mut group. In cohort 2, the median PFS was 14.0 m in long variant group and 12.9 m in short variant group (p = 0.094, HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37–1.13); the median OS was not reached in long variant group and 69.2 m in short variant group (p = 0.254, HR:0.62, 95% CI: 0.27–1.42). However, the efficacy of first‐line crizotinib did not appear to be influenced by the TP53 status. Conclusions EML4‐ALK short variants and TP53 mutations are both adverse factors for first‐line alectinib efficacy, but they have little effect on first‐line crizotinib.
format Article
id doaj-art-7f9a4f7a99e74c428c65b16b74baef72
institution Kabale University
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj-art-7f9a4f7a99e74c428c65b16b74baef722025-01-30T22:40:34ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142025-01-01162n/an/a10.1111/1759-7714.70000Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung CancerZihua Zou0Lige Wu1Xuezhi Hao2Yan Li3Li Liang4Yangchun Gu5Jianming Ying6Junling Li7Puyuan Xing8Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiation Sickness Peking University Third Hospital Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiation Sickness Peking University Third Hospital Beijing ChinaDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaABSTRACT Background The clinical implications of different EML4‐ALK fusion variants remain poorly elucidated in the era of second‐generation ALK inhibitors. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study, wherein patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer harboring EML4‐ALK fusion were stratified into two cohorts based on their first‐line treatment: Cohort 1 received alectinib, while Cohort 2 received crizotinib. Statistical analysis was employed to investigate the impact of different EML4‐ALK variants and TP53 status on the efficacy of first‐line ALK‐TKIs. Results Finally, 49 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and 53 patients in cohort 2. In cohort 1, patients with long EML4‐ALK fusion variants exhibited prolonged PFS (NR vs. 34.0 m, p = 0.004, HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12–0.74) and an elevated 5‐year OS rate (93.3% vs. 68.4%, p = 0.020, HR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.62) compared to those with short variants. The median PFS was not reached in TP53‐wt group and 47.0 m in TP53‐mut group (p = 0.087, HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17–1.17). The TP53‐wt group exhibited a superior 5‐year OS rate (100% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.030) compared to TP53‐mut group. In cohort 2, the median PFS was 14.0 m in long variant group and 12.9 m in short variant group (p = 0.094, HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37–1.13); the median OS was not reached in long variant group and 69.2 m in short variant group (p = 0.254, HR:0.62, 95% CI: 0.27–1.42). However, the efficacy of first‐line crizotinib did not appear to be influenced by the TP53 status. Conclusions EML4‐ALK short variants and TP53 mutations are both adverse factors for first‐line alectinib efficacy, but they have little effect on first‐line crizotinib.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70000EML4‐ALKNSCLCTKITP53
spellingShingle Zihua Zou
Lige Wu
Xuezhi Hao
Yan Li
Li Liang
Yangchun Gu
Jianming Ying
Junling Li
Puyuan Xing
Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
Thoracic Cancer
EML4‐ALK
NSCLC
TKI
TP53
title Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Impact of EML4‐ALK Variants and TP53 Status on the Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors in Patients With Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort impact of eml4 alk variants and tp53 status on the efficacy of alk inhibitors in patients with non small cell lung cancer
topic EML4‐ALK
NSCLC
TKI
TP53
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70000
work_keys_str_mv AT zihuazou impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ligewu impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT xuezhihao impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yanli impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT liliang impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yangchungu impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jianmingying impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT junlingli impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT puyuanxing impactofeml4alkvariantsandtp53statusontheefficacyofalkinhibitorsinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer