Reducing Judicial Inconsistency through AI: A Review of Legal Judgement Prediction Models
Ensuring equitable sentencing is a fundamental objective of the judicial system. However, disparities in law enforcement standards, policies, and personnel competence across regions can lead to divergent sentencing outcomes for similar cases. This inconsistency undermines the integrity of justice an...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Wu Yifan |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | ITM Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://www.itm-conferences.org/articles/itmconf/pdf/2025/01/itmconf_dai2024_02009.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Inconsistency, Paraconsistency and ?-Inconsistency
by: Bruno Da Ré
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Refining Georgia’s Legal Framework for Enforcing Constitutional Court Judgements
by: George Khazalia, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Political, not (just) legal judgement: studying EU institutional balance
by: Martijn van den Brink
Published: (2024-06-01) -
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGEMENT AS A BASIS FOR REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL COURTS' JUDGEMENT
by: L. Terekhova
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Grammar of Spanish legal text: why is it difficult to understand the court judgements
by: Olga Chibisova
Published: (2018-09-01)