Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism

Aesthetic statements of the form ‘X is beautiful’ are evaluative; they indicate the speaker’s positive affective attitude regarding X. Why is this so? Is the evaluative content part of the truth conditions, or is it a pragmatic phenomenon (i.e. presupposition, implicature)? First, I argue that seman...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jochen Briesen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Michigan Publishing 2024-07-01
Series:Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Online Access:https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6159/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850085488776445952
author Jochen Briesen
author_facet Jochen Briesen
author_sort Jochen Briesen
collection DOAJ
description Aesthetic statements of the form ‘X is beautiful’ are evaluative; they indicate the speaker’s positive affective attitude regarding X. Why is this so? Is the evaluative content part of the truth conditions, or is it a pragmatic phenomenon (i.e. presupposition, implicature)? First, I argue that semantic approaches as well as these pragmatic ones cannot satisfactorily explain the evaluativity of aesthetic statements. Second, I offer a positive proposal based on a speech-act theoretical version of hybrid expressivism, which states that, with the literal utterance of ‘X is beautiful’, we perform two illocutionary acts simultaneously, an assertive and an expressive one. I will specify this theory in detail and argue that it can satisfactorily account for the evaluative content of aesthetic statements. I will also discuss the advantages of the theory over other variants of expressivism in meta-aesthetics.
format Article
id doaj-art-7f015d908ec446d4aaece19520a6debb
institution DOAJ
issn 2330-4014
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Michigan Publishing
record_format Article
series Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-7f015d908ec446d4aaece19520a6debb2025-08-20T02:43:42ZengMichigan PublishingErgo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy2330-40142024-07-0111010.3998/ergo.6159Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) ExpressivismJochen Briesen0Philosophy, University of KonstanzAesthetic statements of the form ‘X is beautiful’ are evaluative; they indicate the speaker’s positive affective attitude regarding X. Why is this so? Is the evaluative content part of the truth conditions, or is it a pragmatic phenomenon (i.e. presupposition, implicature)? First, I argue that semantic approaches as well as these pragmatic ones cannot satisfactorily explain the evaluativity of aesthetic statements. Second, I offer a positive proposal based on a speech-act theoretical version of hybrid expressivism, which states that, with the literal utterance of ‘X is beautiful’, we perform two illocutionary acts simultaneously, an assertive and an expressive one. I will specify this theory in detail and argue that it can satisfactorily account for the evaluative content of aesthetic statements. I will also discuss the advantages of the theory over other variants of expressivism in meta-aesthetics.https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6159/
spellingShingle Jochen Briesen
Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
title Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
title_full Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
title_fullStr Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
title_short Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
title_sort aesthetic judgments evaluative content and hybrid expressivism
url https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6159/
work_keys_str_mv AT jochenbriesen aestheticjudgmentsevaluativecontentandhybridexpressivism