In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility
In this paper, we assess the scientific promise and technology feasibility of in situ distributed instruments for planetary surface and atmospheric science. A distributed instrument is an instrument designed to collect spatially and temporally correlated data from multiple networked, geographically...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | The Planetary Science Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada9ec |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850278287371141120 |
|---|---|
| author | Federico Rossi Robert C. Anderson Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay Erik Brandon Ashish Goel Joshua Vander Hook Michael Mischna Michaela Villarreal Mark Wronkiewicz |
| author_facet | Federico Rossi Robert C. Anderson Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay Erik Brandon Ashish Goel Joshua Vander Hook Michael Mischna Michaela Villarreal Mark Wronkiewicz |
| author_sort | Federico Rossi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper, we assess the scientific promise and technology feasibility of in situ distributed instruments for planetary surface and atmospheric science. A distributed instrument is an instrument designed to collect spatially and temporally correlated data from multiple networked, geographically distributed point sensors. Distributed instruments are ubiquitous in Earth science, where they are routinely employed for weather and climate science, seismic studies and resource prospecting, and detection of industrial emissions. However, to date, their adoption in planetary science has been minimal. It is natural to ask whether this lack of adoption is driven by low potential to address high-priority questions in planetary science, immature technology, or both. To address this question, we survey high-priority planetary science questions that are uniquely well suited to distributed, surface-deployed, in situ instruments. We identify four areas of research where such distributed instruments hold promise to unlock answers that are largely inaccessible to monolithic sensors or remote sensing approaches, or can complement existing approaches, namely, in weather and climate studies; localization of seismic events on rocky and icy bodies; localization of trace gas emissions; and magnetometry studies of internal planetary composition. Next, we survey enabling technologies for distributed sensors and assess their maturity. We identify sensor placement (including descent and landing on planetary surfaces), power, and instrument autonomy as three key areas requiring further investment to enable future distributed instruments. Overall, this work shows that distributed instruments hold great promise for planetary science, and paves the way for follow-up studies of future distributed instruments for solar system science. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7ef2e9a04d684a35aef622dde2daadeb |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2632-3338 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Planetary Science Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-7ef2e9a04d684a35aef622dde2daadeb2025-08-20T01:49:35ZengIOP PublishingThe Planetary Science Journal2632-33382025-01-01636610.3847/PSJ/ada9ecIn situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology FeasibilityFederico Rossi0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-881XRobert C. Anderson1Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-2617Erik Brandon3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-7645Ashish Goel4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0401Joshua Vander Hook5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-237XMichael Mischna6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-5319Michaela Villarreal7https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-7741Mark Wronkiewicz8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-3256J et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govJ et Propulsion Laboratory—California Institute of Technology , 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ; federico.rossi@jpl.nasa.govIn this paper, we assess the scientific promise and technology feasibility of in situ distributed instruments for planetary surface and atmospheric science. A distributed instrument is an instrument designed to collect spatially and temporally correlated data from multiple networked, geographically distributed point sensors. Distributed instruments are ubiquitous in Earth science, where they are routinely employed for weather and climate science, seismic studies and resource prospecting, and detection of industrial emissions. However, to date, their adoption in planetary science has been minimal. It is natural to ask whether this lack of adoption is driven by low potential to address high-priority questions in planetary science, immature technology, or both. To address this question, we survey high-priority planetary science questions that are uniquely well suited to distributed, surface-deployed, in situ instruments. We identify four areas of research where such distributed instruments hold promise to unlock answers that are largely inaccessible to monolithic sensors or remote sensing approaches, or can complement existing approaches, namely, in weather and climate studies; localization of seismic events on rocky and icy bodies; localization of trace gas emissions; and magnetometry studies of internal planetary composition. Next, we survey enabling technologies for distributed sensors and assess their maturity. We identify sensor placement (including descent and landing on planetary surfaces), power, and instrument autonomy as three key areas requiring further investment to enable future distributed instruments. Overall, this work shows that distributed instruments hold great promise for planetary science, and paves the way for follow-up studies of future distributed instruments for solar system science.https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada9ecPlanetary sciencePlanetary atmospheresPlanetary dynamicsPlanetary magnetospheresLandersPlanetary probes |
| spellingShingle | Federico Rossi Robert C. Anderson Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay Erik Brandon Ashish Goel Joshua Vander Hook Michael Mischna Michaela Villarreal Mark Wronkiewicz In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility The Planetary Science Journal Planetary science Planetary atmospheres Planetary dynamics Planetary magnetospheres Landers Planetary probes |
| title | In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility |
| title_full | In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility |
| title_fullStr | In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility |
| title_full_unstemmed | In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility |
| title_short | In situ, Surface-deployed Distributed Instruments for Planetary Science: Scientific Opportunities and Technology Feasibility |
| title_sort | in situ surface deployed distributed instruments for planetary science scientific opportunities and technology feasibility |
| topic | Planetary science Planetary atmospheres Planetary dynamics Planetary magnetospheres Landers Planetary probes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada9ec |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT federicorossi insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT robertcanderson insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT saptarshibandyopadhyay insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT erikbrandon insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT ashishgoel insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT joshuavanderhook insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT michaelmischna insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT michaelavillarreal insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility AT markwronkiewicz insitusurfacedeployeddistributedinstrumentsforplanetarysciencescientificopportunitiesandtechnologyfeasibility |