Patients prefer easy adverse event reporting: Observational study within clinical trial
Background Digital intervention safety is crucial for regulatory approval and clinical adoption. However, the evaluation and reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials are often insufficient. Digital qualitative self-reporting could enhance the detection of AEs, but patient preferences for...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Lauri Lukka, Maria Vesterinen, Joonas J. Juvonen, Satu Palva, J. Matias Palva |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Digital Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251345894 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
User journey method: a case study for improving digital intervention use measurement
by: Lauri Lukka, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Linking the microarchitecture of neurotransmitter systems to large-scale MEG resting state networks
by: Felix Siebenhühner, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Modular co-organization of functional connectivity and scale-free dynamics in the human brain
by: Alexander Zhigalov, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Phase-lags in large scale brain synchronization: Methodological considerations and in-silico analysis.
by: Spase Petkoski, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Safety of creatine supplementation: Analysis of Adverse Events reported in clinical trials and adverse event reports
by: Sarah E. Johnson, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01)