Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Remdesivir was widely used in India during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and several guidelines recommended it for hospitalized hypoxic adult and pediatric patients. However, well-designed studies reported inconsistent results, and many international guidelines changed their recommendations wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anupa Thampy, Bhagteshwar Singh, Hanna Alexander, Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus, Joseph L Mathew, Prathap Tharyan, Priscilla Rupali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Current Medical Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmi.cmi_142_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850035996759949312
author Anupa Thampy
Bhagteshwar Singh
Hanna Alexander
Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus
Joseph L Mathew
Prathap Tharyan
Priscilla Rupali
author_facet Anupa Thampy
Bhagteshwar Singh
Hanna Alexander
Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus
Joseph L Mathew
Prathap Tharyan
Priscilla Rupali
author_sort Anupa Thampy
collection DOAJ
description Remdesivir was widely used in India during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and several guidelines recommended it for hospitalized hypoxic adult and pediatric patients. However, well-designed studies reported inconsistent results, and many international guidelines changed their recommendations with each emerging COVID-19 variant. This rapid review was done as part of living evidence synthesis (previous versions available in https://indicovidguidelines.org) to assess the effectiveness of various interventions in COVID-19 infection contextualizing to the current Indian context. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating remdesivir in COVID-19 infection (current to September 29, 2023). Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of search results and extracted data for predefined outcomes. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB v2.0 tool and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. We used hazard ratios for continuous outcomes, risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to determine the certainty of evidence, which was then documented in the “ Table 2. summary of findings using GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. In total, nine RCTs with 12,984 COVID-19 patients were included. Low certainty of evidence revealed that remdesivir when compared to standard care/placebo may reduce progression to noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal oxygen (RR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51–0.98) but makes little to no difference on all-cause mortality at 28–30 days (RR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.84–1.01) and progression to oxygen therapy (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.54–1.22). The effect of remdesivir on progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.51–1.06), adverse effects requiring interruption of therapy (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.41–3.21), and hospitalization (RR = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.03–0.59) was unclear due to the very low certainty of evidence. This review suggests that remdesivir has an unclear benefit in the current context of COVID-19 variants which have a low propensity for severe disease, as well as widespread immunization in the country.
format Article
id doaj-art-7e83e4961dcc4a898660db825873817b
institution DOAJ
issn 0973-4651
2666-4054
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Current Medical Issues
spelling doaj-art-7e83e4961dcc4a898660db825873817b2025-08-20T02:57:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCurrent Medical Issues0973-46512666-40542025-04-0123211912810.4103/cmi.cmi_142_24Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic ReviewAnupa ThampyBhagteshwar SinghHanna AlexanderNaveena Gracelin Princy ZacchaeusJoseph L MathewPrathap TharyanPriscilla RupaliRemdesivir was widely used in India during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and several guidelines recommended it for hospitalized hypoxic adult and pediatric patients. However, well-designed studies reported inconsistent results, and many international guidelines changed their recommendations with each emerging COVID-19 variant. This rapid review was done as part of living evidence synthesis (previous versions available in https://indicovidguidelines.org) to assess the effectiveness of various interventions in COVID-19 infection contextualizing to the current Indian context. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating remdesivir in COVID-19 infection (current to September 29, 2023). Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of search results and extracted data for predefined outcomes. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB v2.0 tool and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. We used hazard ratios for continuous outcomes, risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to determine the certainty of evidence, which was then documented in the “ Table 2. summary of findings using GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. In total, nine RCTs with 12,984 COVID-19 patients were included. Low certainty of evidence revealed that remdesivir when compared to standard care/placebo may reduce progression to noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal oxygen (RR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51–0.98) but makes little to no difference on all-cause mortality at 28–30 days (RR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.84–1.01) and progression to oxygen therapy (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.54–1.22). The effect of remdesivir on progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.51–1.06), adverse effects requiring interruption of therapy (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.41–3.21), and hospitalization (RR = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.03–0.59) was unclear due to the very low certainty of evidence. This review suggests that remdesivir has an unclear benefit in the current context of COVID-19 variants which have a low propensity for severe disease, as well as widespread immunization in the country.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmi.cmi_142_24covid-19meta-analysisremdesivirsystematic review
spellingShingle Anupa Thampy
Bhagteshwar Singh
Hanna Alexander
Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus
Joseph L Mathew
Prathap Tharyan
Priscilla Rupali
Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
Current Medical Issues
covid-19
meta-analysis
remdesivir
systematic review
title Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of patients with covid 19 a systematic review
topic covid-19
meta-analysis
remdesivir
systematic review
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmi.cmi_142_24
work_keys_str_mv AT anupathampy efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT bhagteshwarsingh efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT hannaalexander efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT naveenagracelinprincyzacchaeus efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT josephlmathew efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT prathaptharyan efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT priscillarupali efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview