Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector

Collusive bidding has been a deep-seated issue in the construction market for a long time. The strategies implemented by bid riggers are deliberate, interactive, and complex, suggesting that antitrust authorities have difficulty preventing collusive behaviors. Based on game payoff matrixes, this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenhui Zhu, Yuhang Zheng, Kunhui Ye, Qian Zhang, Minjie Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9913413
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850215156890468352
author Wenhui Zhu
Yuhang Zheng
Kunhui Ye
Qian Zhang
Minjie Zhang
author_facet Wenhui Zhu
Yuhang Zheng
Kunhui Ye
Qian Zhang
Minjie Zhang
author_sort Wenhui Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Collusive bidding has been a deep-seated issue in the construction market for a long time. The strategies implemented by bid riggers are deliberate, interactive, and complex, suggesting that antitrust authorities have difficulty preventing collusive behaviors. Based on game payoff matrixes, this study proposes a system dynamics (SD) model to present the deterrence of punitive measures, namely the certainty of punishment (CoP) and the severity of punishment (SoP), on regular bidders’ to-collude decision-making. Data were collected from the Chinese construction industry to test the proposed SD model. While the model was supported, the results indicate that the CoP has a greater impact than the SoP on deterring regular bidders from making to-collude decisions. Furthermore, these two punitive measures cannot be replaced by each other, given the same deterrence effects. Thus, the study demonstrates the usefulness of deterrence theory to inhibit collusive bidding in the construction sector. It also sheds some light on the formulation of competition policy from the perspective of deterrence.
format Article
id doaj-art-7e3f21aafada4192a4ebf2a54844058f
institution OA Journals
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-7e3f21aafada4192a4ebf2a54844058f2025-08-20T02:08:42ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99134139913413Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction SectorWenhui Zhu0Yuhang Zheng1Kunhui Ye2Qian Zhang3Minjie Zhang4School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, ChinaSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, ChinaInternational Research Center for Sustainable Construction, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, ChinaSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, ChinaSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, ChinaCollusive bidding has been a deep-seated issue in the construction market for a long time. The strategies implemented by bid riggers are deliberate, interactive, and complex, suggesting that antitrust authorities have difficulty preventing collusive behaviors. Based on game payoff matrixes, this study proposes a system dynamics (SD) model to present the deterrence of punitive measures, namely the certainty of punishment (CoP) and the severity of punishment (SoP), on regular bidders’ to-collude decision-making. Data were collected from the Chinese construction industry to test the proposed SD model. While the model was supported, the results indicate that the CoP has a greater impact than the SoP on deterring regular bidders from making to-collude decisions. Furthermore, these two punitive measures cannot be replaced by each other, given the same deterrence effects. Thus, the study demonstrates the usefulness of deterrence theory to inhibit collusive bidding in the construction sector. It also sheds some light on the formulation of competition policy from the perspective of deterrence.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9913413
spellingShingle Wenhui Zhu
Yuhang Zheng
Kunhui Ye
Qian Zhang
Minjie Zhang
Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
Complexity
title Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
title_full Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
title_fullStr Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
title_full_unstemmed Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
title_short Deterrence of Punitive Measures on Collusive Bidding in the Construction Sector
title_sort deterrence of punitive measures on collusive bidding in the construction sector
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9913413
work_keys_str_mv AT wenhuizhu deterrenceofpunitivemeasuresoncollusivebiddingintheconstructionsector
AT yuhangzheng deterrenceofpunitivemeasuresoncollusivebiddingintheconstructionsector
AT kunhuiye deterrenceofpunitivemeasuresoncollusivebiddingintheconstructionsector
AT qianzhang deterrenceofpunitivemeasuresoncollusivebiddingintheconstructionsector
AT minjiezhang deterrenceofpunitivemeasuresoncollusivebiddingintheconstructionsector