Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study

Nonverbal communication is essential in physician–patient interaction, especially in telemedicine where verbal cues may be limited. This study aimed to identify and validate key nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine consultations through a Delphi method. A three-round Delphi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annisa Ristya Rahmanti, Hsuan-Chia Yang, Chih-Wei Huang, Ching-Tzu Huang, Lutfan Lazuardi, Che-Wei Lin, Yu-Chuan Jack Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849323888728604672
author Annisa Ristya Rahmanti
Hsuan-Chia Yang
Chih-Wei Huang
Ching-Tzu Huang
Lutfan Lazuardi
Che-Wei Lin
Yu-Chuan Jack Li
author_facet Annisa Ristya Rahmanti
Hsuan-Chia Yang
Chih-Wei Huang
Ching-Tzu Huang
Lutfan Lazuardi
Che-Wei Lin
Yu-Chuan Jack Li
author_sort Annisa Ristya Rahmanti
collection DOAJ
description Nonverbal communication is essential in physician–patient interaction, especially in telemedicine where verbal cues may be limited. This study aimed to identify and validate key nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine consultations through a Delphi method. A three-round Delphi study was conducted from June to November 2022, involving various experts, including academics, healthcare professionals, AI/telemedicine researchers, industry professionals, and patients. Experts evaluated the importance, validity, and reliability of potential nonverbal cues. Consensus was determined based on median responses and expert scoring percentages, with statistical agreement and stability assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 23.0 with significance set at p < 0.05. Of the 72 experts invited, 37 (51%) agreed to participate, with 35 completing the first round (95% completion rate). Eight significant nonverbal cues were identified in the first round, though one did not reach consensus. The second round obtained an 89% response rate (31/35), with three new cues introduced; one did not reach consensus. Round 3 achieved a 94% response rate (29/31), finalizing nine key cues: facial expression, eye contact, tone of voice, smiling, head nodding, body posture, hand gesture, distance, and environmental cues. Among these, facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice were identified as the most crucial. Inter-expert agreement was statistically significant across all items with strong agreement on the importance (W = 0.739, p < 0.001), good agreement on their validity (W = 0.689, p < 0.001), and moderate agreement on their reliability (W = 0.452, p < 0.001). This study highlights the importance of specific nonverbal cues in telemedicine, particularly facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice. It provides a validated foundation for developing tools to enhance physician–patient interactions and potentially improve health outcomes in telemedicine.
format Article
id doaj-art-7e3c2cfc9c854fafb8e0d2866a12e331
institution Kabale University
issn 1087-2981
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Medical Education Online
spelling doaj-art-7e3c2cfc9c854fafb8e0d2866a12e3312025-08-20T03:48:52ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812025-12-0130110.1080/10872981.2025.2497328Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi studyAnnisa Ristya Rahmanti0Hsuan-Chia Yang1Chih-Wei Huang2Ching-Tzu Huang3Lutfan Lazuardi4Che-Wei Lin5Yu-Chuan Jack Li6Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaInternational Center for Health Information and Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanInternational Center for Health Information and Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanInternational Center for Health Information and Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaCenter for Education in Medical Simulation, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanInternational Center for Health Information and Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanNonverbal communication is essential in physician–patient interaction, especially in telemedicine where verbal cues may be limited. This study aimed to identify and validate key nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine consultations through a Delphi method. A three-round Delphi study was conducted from June to November 2022, involving various experts, including academics, healthcare professionals, AI/telemedicine researchers, industry professionals, and patients. Experts evaluated the importance, validity, and reliability of potential nonverbal cues. Consensus was determined based on median responses and expert scoring percentages, with statistical agreement and stability assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 23.0 with significance set at p < 0.05. Of the 72 experts invited, 37 (51%) agreed to participate, with 35 completing the first round (95% completion rate). Eight significant nonverbal cues were identified in the first round, though one did not reach consensus. The second round obtained an 89% response rate (31/35), with three new cues introduced; one did not reach consensus. Round 3 achieved a 94% response rate (29/31), finalizing nine key cues: facial expression, eye contact, tone of voice, smiling, head nodding, body posture, hand gesture, distance, and environmental cues. Among these, facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice were identified as the most crucial. Inter-expert agreement was statistically significant across all items with strong agreement on the importance (W = 0.739, p < 0.001), good agreement on their validity (W = 0.689, p < 0.001), and moderate agreement on their reliability (W = 0.452, p < 0.001). This study highlights the importance of specific nonverbal cues in telemedicine, particularly facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice. It provides a validated foundation for developing tools to enhance physician–patient interactions and potentially improve health outcomes in telemedicine.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328Nonverbal communicationtelemedicinedoctor–patient interactionDelphi studyempathy
spellingShingle Annisa Ristya Rahmanti
Hsuan-Chia Yang
Chih-Wei Huang
Ching-Tzu Huang
Lutfan Lazuardi
Che-Wei Lin
Yu-Chuan Jack Li
Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
Medical Education Online
Nonverbal communication
telemedicine
doctor–patient interaction
Delphi study
empathy
title Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
title_full Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
title_short Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study
title_sort validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine a delphi study
topic Nonverbal communication
telemedicine
doctor–patient interaction
Delphi study
empathy
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328
work_keys_str_mv AT annisaristyarahmanti validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT hsuanchiayang validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT chihweihuang validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT chingtzuhuang validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT lutfanlazuardi validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT cheweilin validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy
AT yuchuanjackli validatingnonverbalcuesforassessingphysicianempathyintelemedicineadelphistudy