Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives
Background Decision-making capacity (DMC) is key to capacity-based mental health laws. In 2017, Norway introduced a lack of DMC as an additional criterion for involuntary care and treatment to strengthen patient autonomy and reduce involuntary care. Health registry data reveal an initial reduction f...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | BJPsych Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205647242400810X/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background
Decision-making capacity (DMC) is key to capacity-based mental health laws. In 2017, Norway introduced a lack of DMC as an additional criterion for involuntary care and treatment to strengthen patient autonomy and reduce involuntary care. Health registry data reveal an initial reduction followed by rising involuntary care and treatment rates post-2017. Despite jurisdictions moving towards capacity-based mental health laws, little is known about their impact.
Aims
To explore the impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law governing involuntary care and treatment.
Method
Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted in 2018 with 60 purposively sampled stakeholders, including patients, families, health professionals and lawyers. Of these, 26 participated in individual follow-up interviews in 2022–23. The transcribed interviews were thematically analysed following Braun and Clarke.
Results
Four themes emerged: (a) increased awareness of patient autonomy and improved patient involvement; (b) altered thresholds for involuntary admission and discharge and more challenging to help certain patient groups; (c) more responsibility for primary health services; and (d) increased family responsibility but unchanged involvement by health services.
Conclusions
Introducing a capacity-based mental health law appears to raise awareness of patient autonomy, but its impact depends on an interplay of complex health, social and legal systems. Post-2017 changes, including rising involuntary care and treatment rates, higher thresholds for admissions and increased pressure on primary health services and families, may be influenced by several factors. These include implementation of decision-making capacity, legal interpretations, formal measures for care of non-resistant incompetent individuals, reduced in-patient bed availability, inadequate voluntary treatment options and societal developments. Further research is needed to better understand these changes and their causes.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2056-4724 |