Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering st...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/351 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets whose legitimate origin cannot be proven. This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2525-510X |