Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayşe Aslı Şenol, Seda Özmen, Büşra Karabulut Gençer, Bilge Tarçın, Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ankara University 2024-04-01
Series:European Annals of Dental Sciences
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841525464940675072
author Ayşe Aslı Şenol
Seda Özmen
Büşra Karabulut Gençer
Bilge Tarçın
Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
author_facet Ayşe Aslı Şenol
Seda Özmen
Büşra Karabulut Gençer
Bilge Tarçın
Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
author_sort Ayşe Aslı Şenol
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound human molars were cleaned and stored in distilled water. Sixty standard Class V cavities were prepared on gingival 1/3 of buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. Teeth were randomly assigned into 3 groups corresponding to the selected restorative material (Fuji II LC Capsule/FC, GC; Beautifil Flow Plus/BF, Shofu; and GrandioSo Flow/GF, VOCO). Lingual cavities were pre-treated with CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco). The cavities were restored according to manufacturer's instructions using the materials' own adhesive systems. Teeth were stored in distilled water (24°C) for 6 months for aging. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 1 h and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Occlusal/gingival margins were examined for dye penetration and scored under x8 and x20 magnification using stereomicroscope (Leica MZ7.5, Leica Microsystems). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test with a significance level of p0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of microleakage of GF, FC and BF restorations in CHX-treated and untreated cavities (p>0.05).Conclusion: Application of CHX as cavity cleaner could not prevent dye penetration in Class V cavities restored with giomer, glass ionomer, and resin composites.Key Words: Chlorhexidine gluconate, composite resin, glass ionomer, microleakage.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d8fcc5718284e1ca2c01c418a53841f
institution Kabale University
issn 2757-6744
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Ankara University
record_format Article
series European Annals of Dental Sciences
spelling doaj-art-7d8fcc5718284e1ca2c01c418a53841f2025-01-17T11:28:06ZengAnkara UniversityEuropean Annals of Dental Sciences2757-67442024-04-01511202710.52037/eads.2024.0004 Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities Ayşe Aslı Şenol0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-4877Seda Özmen1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-8828Büşra Karabulut Gençer2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-0662Bilge Tarçın3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-8671Pınar Yılmaz Atalı4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-360XMARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİNISANTASI UNIVERSITYMARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR. Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound human molars were cleaned and stored in distilled water. Sixty standard Class V cavities were prepared on gingival 1/3 of buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. Teeth were randomly assigned into 3 groups corresponding to the selected restorative material (Fuji II LC Capsule/FC, GC; Beautifil Flow Plus/BF, Shofu; and GrandioSo Flow/GF, VOCO). Lingual cavities were pre-treated with CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco). The cavities were restored according to manufacturer's instructions using the materials' own adhesive systems. Teeth were stored in distilled water (24°C) for 6 months for aging. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 1 h and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Occlusal/gingival margins were examined for dye penetration and scored under x8 and x20 magnification using stereomicroscope (Leica MZ7.5, Leica Microsystems). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test with a significance level of p0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of microleakage of GF, FC and BF restorations in CHX-treated and untreated cavities (p>0.05).Conclusion: Application of CHX as cavity cleaner could not prevent dye penetration in Class V cavities restored with giomer, glass ionomer, and resin composites.Key Words: Chlorhexidine gluconate, composite resin, glass ionomer, microleakage.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004
spellingShingle Ayşe Aslı Şenol
Seda Özmen
Büşra Karabulut Gençer
Bilge Tarçın
Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
European Annals of Dental Sciences
title Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
title_full Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
title_fullStr Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
title_short Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
title_sort effect of chlorhexidine treatment on microleakage of glass ionomer giomer and methacrylate based composite restorations in class v cavities
url https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004
work_keys_str_mv AT ayseaslısenol effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities
AT sedaozmen effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities
AT busrakarabulutgencer effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities
AT bilgetarcın effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities
AT pınaryılmazatalı effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities