Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ankara University
2024-04-01
|
Series: | European Annals of Dental Sciences |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841525464940675072 |
---|---|
author | Ayşe Aslı Şenol Seda Özmen Büşra Karabulut Gençer Bilge Tarçın Pınar Yılmaz Atalı |
author_facet | Ayşe Aslı Şenol Seda Özmen Büşra Karabulut Gençer Bilge Tarçın Pınar Yılmaz Atalı |
author_sort | Ayşe Aslı Şenol |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound human molars were cleaned and stored in distilled water. Sixty standard Class V cavities were prepared on gingival 1/3 of buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. Teeth were randomly assigned into 3 groups corresponding to the selected restorative material (Fuji II LC Capsule/FC, GC; Beautifil Flow Plus/BF, Shofu; and GrandioSo Flow/GF, VOCO). Lingual cavities were pre-treated with CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco). The cavities were restored according to manufacturer's instructions using the materials' own adhesive systems. Teeth were stored in distilled water (24°C) for 6 months for aging. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 1 h and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Occlusal/gingival margins were examined for dye penetration and scored under x8 and x20 magnification using stereomicroscope (Leica MZ7.5, Leica Microsystems). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test with a significance level of p0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of microleakage of GF, FC and BF restorations in CHX-treated and untreated cavities (p>0.05).Conclusion: Application of CHX as cavity cleaner could not prevent dye penetration in Class V cavities restored with giomer, glass ionomer, and resin composites.Key Words: Chlorhexidine gluconate, composite resin, glass ionomer, microleakage. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-7d8fcc5718284e1ca2c01c418a53841f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2757-6744 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
publisher | Ankara University |
record_format | Article |
series | European Annals of Dental Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-7d8fcc5718284e1ca2c01c418a53841f2025-01-17T11:28:06ZengAnkara UniversityEuropean Annals of Dental Sciences2757-67442024-04-01511202710.52037/eads.2024.0004 Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities Ayşe Aslı Şenol0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-4877Seda Özmen1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-8828Büşra Karabulut Gençer2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-0662Bilge Tarçın3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-8671Pınar Yılmaz Atalı4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-360XMARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİNISANTASI UNIVERSITYMARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR. Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of material selection and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) pretreatment on microleakage in Class V cavities restored with 3 different restorative materials.Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted sound human molars were cleaned and stored in distilled water. Sixty standard Class V cavities were prepared on gingival 1/3 of buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. Teeth were randomly assigned into 3 groups corresponding to the selected restorative material (Fuji II LC Capsule/FC, GC; Beautifil Flow Plus/BF, Shofu; and GrandioSo Flow/GF, VOCO). Lingual cavities were pre-treated with CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco). The cavities were restored according to manufacturer's instructions using the materials' own adhesive systems. Teeth were stored in distilled water (24°C) for 6 months for aging. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 1 h and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Occlusal/gingival margins were examined for dye penetration and scored under x8 and x20 magnification using stereomicroscope (Leica MZ7.5, Leica Microsystems). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test with a significance level of p0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of microleakage of GF, FC and BF restorations in CHX-treated and untreated cavities (p>0.05).Conclusion: Application of CHX as cavity cleaner could not prevent dye penetration in Class V cavities restored with giomer, glass ionomer, and resin composites.Key Words: Chlorhexidine gluconate, composite resin, glass ionomer, microleakage.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004 |
spellingShingle | Ayşe Aslı Şenol Seda Özmen Büşra Karabulut Gençer Bilge Tarçın Pınar Yılmaz Atalı Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities European Annals of Dental Sciences |
title |
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
|
title_full |
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
|
title_fullStr |
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
|
title_short |
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
|
title_sort | effect of chlorhexidine treatment on microleakage of glass ionomer giomer and methacrylate based composite restorations in class v cavities |
url | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.52037/eads.2024.0004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ayseaslısenol effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities AT sedaozmen effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities AT busrakarabulutgencer effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities AT bilgetarcın effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities AT pınaryılmazatalı effectofchlorhexidinetreatmentonmicroleakageofglassionomergiomerandmethacrylatebasedcompositerestorationsinclassvcavities |