Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative

Background Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities. Local problem Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25–49) and 62% (ages 50–64) by June 2022, both significantly below the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-08-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/3/e003111.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849236014141276160
author Carlos Santos
Julie Roye
Joyce Tucker
Christina Guevara
author_facet Carlos Santos
Julie Roye
Joyce Tucker
Christina Guevara
author_sort Carlos Santos
collection DOAJ
description Background Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities. Local problem Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25–49) and 62% (ages 50–64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups. Methods Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement. Results This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25–49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50–64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points—a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25–49) and 82% (ages 50–64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes. Conclusions This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d8d41c4fe73408eaa36612a50209063
institution Kabale University
issn 2399-6641
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Quality
spelling doaj-art-7d8d41c4fe73408eaa36612a502090632025-08-20T04:02:31ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412025-08-0114310.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiativeCarlos Santos0Julie Roye1Joyce Tucker2Christina Guevara3Quality Improvement Department, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKBackground Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities. Local problem Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25–49) and 62% (ages 50–64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups. Methods Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement. Results This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25–49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50–64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points—a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25–49) and 82% (ages 50–64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes. Conclusions This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/3/e003111.full
spellingShingle Carlos Santos
Julie Roye
Joyce Tucker
Christina Guevara
Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
BMJ Open Quality
title Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
title_full Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
title_fullStr Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
title_short Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
title_sort enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/3/e003111.full
work_keys_str_mv AT carlossantos enhancingequityandefficiencyincervicalscreeninguptakeamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementinitiative
AT julieroye enhancingequityandefficiencyincervicalscreeninguptakeamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementinitiative
AT joycetucker enhancingequityandefficiencyincervicalscreeninguptakeamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementinitiative
AT christinaguevara enhancingequityandefficiencyincervicalscreeninguptakeamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementinitiative