Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation

RP-HPLC (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography) is widely used to determine the amounts of the different gluten protein types. However, this method is time-consuming, especially at early stages of wheat breeding, when large number of samples needs to be analyzed. On the other hand, L...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dragan Živančev, Daniela Horvat, Aleksandra Torbica, Miona Belović, Gordana Šimić, Damir Magdić, Nevena Đukić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/430328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849410017316306944
author Dragan Živančev
Daniela Horvat
Aleksandra Torbica
Miona Belović
Gordana Šimić
Damir Magdić
Nevena Đukić
author_facet Dragan Živančev
Daniela Horvat
Aleksandra Torbica
Miona Belović
Gordana Šimić
Damir Magdić
Nevena Đukić
author_sort Dragan Živančev
collection DOAJ
description RP-HPLC (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography) is widely used to determine the amounts of the different gluten protein types. However, this method is time-consuming, especially at early stages of wheat breeding, when large number of samples needs to be analyzed. On the other hand, LoaC (Lab-on-a-Chip) technique has the potential for a fast, reliable, and automatable analysis of proteins. In the present study, benefits and limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip method over RP-HPLC method in gluten proteins evaluation were explored in order to determine in which way LoaC method should be improved in order to make its results more compliant with the results of RP-HPLC method. Strong correlation (P≤0.001) was found between numbers of HMW glutenin peaks determined by LoaC and RP-HPLC methods. Significant correlations (P≤0.05) were obtained between percentages of HMW and LMW glutenin subunits calculated with regard to total HMW + LMW area. Even more significant correlation (P≤0.001) was found when percentages of individual HMW areas were calculated with regard to total HMW. RP-HPLC method showed superiority in determination of gliadins since larger number and better resolution of gliadin peaks were obtained by this method.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d5e641b77c44f92ab69bbaa2b088133
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-9063
2090-9071
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-7d5e641b77c44f92ab69bbaa2b0881332025-08-20T03:35:19ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90632090-90712015-01-01201510.1155/2015/430328430328Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins EvaluationDragan Živančev0Daniela Horvat1Aleksandra Torbica2Miona Belović3Gordana Šimić4Damir Magdić5Nevena Đukić6Institute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaAgricultural Institute Osijek, Južno Predgrađe 17, 31000 Osijek, CroatiaInstitute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaInstitute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaAgricultural Institute Osijek, Južno Predgrađe 17, 31000 Osijek, CroatiaFaculty of Food Technology, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Franje Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, CroatiaFaculty of Natural Science, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, SerbiaRP-HPLC (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography) is widely used to determine the amounts of the different gluten protein types. However, this method is time-consuming, especially at early stages of wheat breeding, when large number of samples needs to be analyzed. On the other hand, LoaC (Lab-on-a-Chip) technique has the potential for a fast, reliable, and automatable analysis of proteins. In the present study, benefits and limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip method over RP-HPLC method in gluten proteins evaluation were explored in order to determine in which way LoaC method should be improved in order to make its results more compliant with the results of RP-HPLC method. Strong correlation (P≤0.001) was found between numbers of HMW glutenin peaks determined by LoaC and RP-HPLC methods. Significant correlations (P≤0.05) were obtained between percentages of HMW and LMW glutenin subunits calculated with regard to total HMW + LMW area. Even more significant correlation (P≤0.001) was found when percentages of individual HMW areas were calculated with regard to total HMW. RP-HPLC method showed superiority in determination of gliadins since larger number and better resolution of gliadin peaks were obtained by this method.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/430328
spellingShingle Dragan Živančev
Daniela Horvat
Aleksandra Torbica
Miona Belović
Gordana Šimić
Damir Magdić
Nevena Đukić
Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
Journal of Chemistry
title Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
title_full Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
title_fullStr Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
title_short Benefits and Limitations of Lab-on-a-Chip Method over Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method in Gluten Proteins Evaluation
title_sort benefits and limitations of lab on a chip method over reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography method in gluten proteins evaluation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/430328
work_keys_str_mv AT draganzivancev benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT danielahorvat benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT aleksandratorbica benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT mionabelovic benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT gordanasimic benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT damirmagdic benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation
AT nevenađukic benefitsandlimitationsoflabonachipmethodoverreversedphasehighperformanceliquidchromatographymethodinglutenproteinsevaluation