Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate possible problems during pregnancy or delivery in women with pediatric bladder augmentation. Methods Eleven of 59 women, who had undergone bladder augmentation in our pediatric hospital during 1990–2019, had given birth in our hospital district afterwards and their obste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Porela‐Tiihonen Susanna, Jernman Riina, Taskinen Seppo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70222
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850101957014847488
author Porela‐Tiihonen Susanna
Jernman Riina
Taskinen Seppo
author_facet Porela‐Tiihonen Susanna
Jernman Riina
Taskinen Seppo
author_sort Porela‐Tiihonen Susanna
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate possible problems during pregnancy or delivery in women with pediatric bladder augmentation. Methods Eleven of 59 women, who had undergone bladder augmentation in our pediatric hospital during 1990–2019, had given birth in our hospital district afterwards and their obstetrical records were evaluated. Results Median age at first delivery was 32 years (range 26–42). Six patients had myelomeningocele, two had bladder exstrophy and the remainder had VATER association, epispadias or traumatic paraplegia with vesicovaginal fistula. The patients had altogether 18 children (all singletons). Catheterizations were performed through continent stoma in six cases and through urethra in five cases. None of the patients needed an indwelling catheter before delivery. Antibiotic prophylaxis was initially in use during two pregnancies. Symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) developed for five mothers in 11 pregnancies without prophylaxis and prophylaxis was continued after UTI in these cases. Three of the five mothers with UTI were treated with intravenous antibiotics due to pseudomonas infection (three infections) or pyelonephritis (one). Two patients with myelomeningocele delivered vaginally (one woman three times and one woman once). In the remaining 14 cases a cesarean section (CS) was performed (two urgent and one emergency CS). A urologist was present in seven CSs. Some difficulties accessing the uterus were reported in seven surgeries. There were 10‐term, three late‐preterm and one very preterm delivery. In four cases the information on gestational age was unavailable. Six newborns had respiratory problems, two had severe asphyxia. One newborn had myelomeningocele like her mother. Conclusions Risk for UTIs during pregnancy is high in bladder augmentation patients, hence prophylactic antibiotics are justified. A multidisciplinary team should be involved in the planning of delivery. When indicated for obstetrical or urological reasons, an elective cesarean section with a urologist present may be the most rational option for many, although vaginal delivery is possible in selected patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d4498b9883b4c50bbf98484411c8712
institution DOAJ
issn 2398-8835
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj-art-7d4498b9883b4c50bbf98484411c87122025-08-20T02:39:52ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352024-12-01712n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.70222Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder AugmentationPorela‐Tiihonen Susanna0Jernman Riina1Taskinen Seppo2Department of Pediatric Surgery Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki FinlandDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, New Children's Hospital Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki Helsinki FinlandABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate possible problems during pregnancy or delivery in women with pediatric bladder augmentation. Methods Eleven of 59 women, who had undergone bladder augmentation in our pediatric hospital during 1990–2019, had given birth in our hospital district afterwards and their obstetrical records were evaluated. Results Median age at first delivery was 32 years (range 26–42). Six patients had myelomeningocele, two had bladder exstrophy and the remainder had VATER association, epispadias or traumatic paraplegia with vesicovaginal fistula. The patients had altogether 18 children (all singletons). Catheterizations were performed through continent stoma in six cases and through urethra in five cases. None of the patients needed an indwelling catheter before delivery. Antibiotic prophylaxis was initially in use during two pregnancies. Symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) developed for five mothers in 11 pregnancies without prophylaxis and prophylaxis was continued after UTI in these cases. Three of the five mothers with UTI were treated with intravenous antibiotics due to pseudomonas infection (three infections) or pyelonephritis (one). Two patients with myelomeningocele delivered vaginally (one woman three times and one woman once). In the remaining 14 cases a cesarean section (CS) was performed (two urgent and one emergency CS). A urologist was present in seven CSs. Some difficulties accessing the uterus were reported in seven surgeries. There were 10‐term, three late‐preterm and one very preterm delivery. In four cases the information on gestational age was unavailable. Six newborns had respiratory problems, two had severe asphyxia. One newborn had myelomeningocele like her mother. Conclusions Risk for UTIs during pregnancy is high in bladder augmentation patients, hence prophylactic antibiotics are justified. A multidisciplinary team should be involved in the planning of delivery. When indicated for obstetrical or urological reasons, an elective cesarean section with a urologist present may be the most rational option for many, although vaginal delivery is possible in selected patients.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70222augmentation cystoplastybladder augmentationcesarean sectiondeliverypregnancy
spellingShingle Porela‐Tiihonen Susanna
Jernman Riina
Taskinen Seppo
Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
Health Science Reports
augmentation cystoplasty
bladder augmentation
cesarean section
delivery
pregnancy
title Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
title_full Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
title_fullStr Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
title_short Obstetrical Outcomes in Women With a History of Bladder Augmentation
title_sort obstetrical outcomes in women with a history of bladder augmentation
topic augmentation cystoplasty
bladder augmentation
cesarean section
delivery
pregnancy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70222
work_keys_str_mv AT porelatiihonensusanna obstetricaloutcomesinwomenwithahistoryofbladderaugmentation
AT jernmanriina obstetricaloutcomesinwomenwithahistoryofbladderaugmentation
AT taskinenseppo obstetricaloutcomesinwomenwithahistoryofbladderaugmentation