Modeling trajectories of routine blood tests as dynamic biomarkers for outcome in spinal cord injury

Abstract Routinely collected blood tests can reflect underlying pathophysiological processes. We demonstrate that the dynamics of routinely collected blood tests hold prediction validity in acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Using MIMIC data (n = 2615) for modeling and TRACK-SCI study data (n = 137) fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marzieh Mussavi Rizi, Daniel Fernández, John L. K. Kramer, Rajiv Saigal, Anthony M. DiGiorgio, Michael S. Beattie, Adam R. Ferguson, Nikos Kyritsis, Abel Torres-Espín, TRACK-SCI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:npj Digital Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01782-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Routinely collected blood tests can reflect underlying pathophysiological processes. We demonstrate that the dynamics of routinely collected blood tests hold prediction validity in acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Using MIMIC data (n = 2615) for modeling and TRACK-SCI study data (n = 137) for validation, we identified multiple trajectories for common blood markers. We developed machine learning models for the dynamic prediction of in-hospital mortality, SCI occurrence in spine trauma patients, and SCI severity (motor complete vs. incomplete). The in-hospital mortality model achieved an out-of-train ROC-AUC of 0.79 [0.77–0.81] day one post-injury, improving to 0.89 [0.88–0.89] by day 21. For detecting the presence of SCI after spine trauma, the highest ROC-AUC was 0.71 [0.69–0.72] achieved by day 21. By day seven, the ROC-AUC for SCI severity was 0.81 [0.77–0.85]. Our full models outperformed the severity score SAPS II following seven days of hospitalization.
ISSN:2398-6352