Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence
Aim — The aim of this study was to analyse how conventional urodynamic values differ between females with specific types of urinary incontinence (UI). Material and Methods — Cross-sectional study enrolled 666 females with UI. Based on patient history and questionnaires they were divided into three...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Limited liability company «Science and Innovations» (Saratov)
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Russian Open Medical Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://romj.org/node/388 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849735531704877056 |
|---|---|
| author | Zane Pilsetniece Egils Vjaters |
| author_facet | Zane Pilsetniece Egils Vjaters |
| author_sort | Zane Pilsetniece |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim — The aim of this study was to analyse how conventional urodynamic values differ between females with specific types of urinary incontinence (UI).
Material and Methods — Cross-sectional study enrolled 666 females with UI. Based on patient history and questionnaires they were divided into three groups: stress (SUI), mixed (MixUI) and urgency (UUI). Physical investigation and urodynamics were performed. The continuous factors: age and urodynamic data were evaluated using Multinomial regression and ANOVA test using SUI, MixUI, UUI as outcome groups.
Results — Analysing urodynamic parameters significant difference between at least two groups was shown by the cystometric capacity and maximum flow rate: both highest in the SUI group; residual urine, opening detrusor pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure at rest, functional urethral length at rest: all highest in the UUI group. Mainly all urodynamic data showed significant difference between SUI/UUI, and MixUI/UUI groups, while difference between SUI/MixUI were not significant.
Conclusions — Most of urodynamic data for MixUI group patients do not differ from SUI group. UDS parameters like: maximum flow rate, residual urine, opening detrusor pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure at rest, functional urethral length at rest can help to distinguish SUI and MixUI groups from UUI group. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7cd5a5139d9049b384918a3f9cee5ca6 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2304-3415 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Limited liability company «Science and Innovations» (Saratov) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Russian Open Medical Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-7cd5a5139d9049b384918a3f9cee5ca62025-08-20T03:07:32ZengLimited liability company «Science and Innovations» (Saratov)Russian Open Medical Journal2304-34152021-09-01103e031610.15275/rusomj.2021.0316Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinenceZane PilsetnieceEgils VjatersAim — The aim of this study was to analyse how conventional urodynamic values differ between females with specific types of urinary incontinence (UI). Material and Methods — Cross-sectional study enrolled 666 females with UI. Based on patient history and questionnaires they were divided into three groups: stress (SUI), mixed (MixUI) and urgency (UUI). Physical investigation and urodynamics were performed. The continuous factors: age and urodynamic data were evaluated using Multinomial regression and ANOVA test using SUI, MixUI, UUI as outcome groups. Results — Analysing urodynamic parameters significant difference between at least two groups was shown by the cystometric capacity and maximum flow rate: both highest in the SUI group; residual urine, opening detrusor pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure at rest, functional urethral length at rest: all highest in the UUI group. Mainly all urodynamic data showed significant difference between SUI/UUI, and MixUI/UUI groups, while difference between SUI/MixUI were not significant. Conclusions — Most of urodynamic data for MixUI group patients do not differ from SUI group. UDS parameters like: maximum flow rate, residual urine, opening detrusor pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure at rest, functional urethral length at rest can help to distinguish SUI and MixUI groups from UUI group.https://romj.org/node/388femalepressure-flow studyurinary incontinenceurodynamicsurethral pressure profilometry |
| spellingShingle | Zane Pilsetniece Egils Vjaters Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence Russian Open Medical Journal female pressure-flow study urinary incontinence urodynamics urethral pressure profilometry |
| title | Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| title_full | Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| title_fullStr | Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| title_short | Urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| title_sort | urodynamic values role for females with different types of urinary incontinence |
| topic | female pressure-flow study urinary incontinence urodynamics urethral pressure profilometry |
| url | https://romj.org/node/388 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zanepilsetniece urodynamicvaluesroleforfemaleswithdifferenttypesofurinaryincontinence AT egilsvjaters urodynamicvaluesroleforfemaleswithdifferenttypesofurinaryincontinence |