Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs
Available floor space allocation recommendations are based on considerably lighter market-weight pigs than currently in the United States (i.e., ~130 kg). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual floor space allocation on overall growth performance and carc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Animals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/10/1451 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850255291697856512 |
|---|---|
| author | Ryan S. Samuel Joseph E. Darrington Benoit St-Pierre Crystal L. Levesque Robert C. Thaler |
| author_facet | Ryan S. Samuel Joseph E. Darrington Benoit St-Pierre Crystal L. Levesque Robert C. Thaler |
| author_sort | Ryan S. Samuel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Available floor space allocation recommendations are based on considerably lighter market-weight pigs than currently in the United States (i.e., ~130 kg). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual floor space allocation on overall growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs raised to >135 kg. Over 49 d, three floor space per pig allocations were tested: 0.88, 0.75, and 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. When the average weight of pigs in the barn reached 135 kg, the heaviest pigs from each pen were marketed in four cuts, approximately one week apart. Overall, weekly feed disappearance per pig, the mean body weights of pigs, and gain:feed was not affected by floor space allocation (<i>p</i> > 0.10). Pigs remaining in pens with 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig tended (<i>p</i> < 0.09) to be lighter after the first cut than pigs raised with 0.88 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. However, there was no difference in body weight between the floor space allocations when the final group was marketed (143.9 ± 0.6 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Carcass lean percent tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to be greater (56.8 vs. 56.4%) from pigs provided 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig of floor space. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7cd363f0752c4ef6a7a6f8a909ef52a6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2076-2615 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Animals |
| spelling | doaj-art-7cd363f0752c4ef6a7a6f8a909ef52a62025-08-20T01:56:55ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152025-05-011510145110.3390/ani15101451Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing PigsRyan S. Samuel0Joseph E. Darrington1Benoit St-Pierre2Crystal L. Levesque3Robert C. Thaler4Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USADepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USAAvailable floor space allocation recommendations are based on considerably lighter market-weight pigs than currently in the United States (i.e., ~130 kg). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual floor space allocation on overall growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs raised to >135 kg. Over 49 d, three floor space per pig allocations were tested: 0.88, 0.75, and 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. When the average weight of pigs in the barn reached 135 kg, the heaviest pigs from each pen were marketed in four cuts, approximately one week apart. Overall, weekly feed disappearance per pig, the mean body weights of pigs, and gain:feed was not affected by floor space allocation (<i>p</i> > 0.10). Pigs remaining in pens with 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig tended (<i>p</i> < 0.09) to be lighter after the first cut than pigs raised with 0.88 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. However, there was no difference in body weight between the floor space allocations when the final group was marketed (143.9 ± 0.6 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Carcass lean percent tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to be greater (56.8 vs. 56.4%) from pigs provided 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig of floor space.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/10/1451housingswineproductionfloor spacemarket weightcarcass |
| spellingShingle | Ryan S. Samuel Joseph E. Darrington Benoit St-Pierre Crystal L. Levesque Robert C. Thaler Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs Animals housing swine production floor space market weight carcass |
| title | Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs |
| title_full | Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs |
| title_fullStr | Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs |
| title_short | Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs |
| title_sort | effect of pen space allowances on growth performance of finishing pigs |
| topic | housing swine production floor space market weight carcass |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/10/1451 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanssamuel effectofpenspaceallowancesongrowthperformanceoffinishingpigs AT josephedarrington effectofpenspaceallowancesongrowthperformanceoffinishingpigs AT benoitstpierre effectofpenspaceallowancesongrowthperformanceoffinishingpigs AT crystalllevesque effectofpenspaceallowancesongrowthperformanceoffinishingpigs AT robertcthaler effectofpenspaceallowancesongrowthperformanceoffinishingpigs |