RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION
The Polish May Constitution, formally recognized as the fi rst constitution in Europe, differed from the American Federal Constitution of 1787 and the French Constitution of 1791 in that that it had failed to create any legitimized foundations for a pro-revolutionary or modern state. Even worse, th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne |
| Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cph/article/view/4225 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850119237731876864 |
|---|---|
| author | ULRIKE MÜßIG |
| author_facet | ULRIKE MÜßIG |
| author_sort | ULRIKE MÜßIG |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The Polish May Constitution, formally recognized as the fi rst constitution in Europe, differed from the American Federal Constitution of 1787 and the French Constitution of 1791 in that that it had failed to create any legitimized foundations for a pro-revolutionary or modern state. Even worse, the Polish Constitution of 1791 did not provide for Polish citizenship, nor did it directly articulate the principle of the equality of citizens or for political equality, or proclaimed the fundamental rights.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7cb1e6ce658a4cf78a0b035158bf2d90 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0070-2471 2720-2186 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
| publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne |
| spelling | doaj-art-7cb1e6ce658a4cf78a0b035158bf2d902025-08-20T02:35:40ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz UniversityCzasopismo Prawno-Historyczne0070-24712720-21862015-03-0167110.14746/cph.2015.68.1.03RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATIONULRIKE MÜßIG The Polish May Constitution, formally recognized as the fi rst constitution in Europe, differed from the American Federal Constitution of 1787 and the French Constitution of 1791 in that that it had failed to create any legitimized foundations for a pro-revolutionary or modern state. Even worse, the Polish Constitution of 1791 did not provide for Polish citizenship, nor did it directly articulate the principle of the equality of citizens or for political equality, or proclaimed the fundamental rights. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cph/article/view/4225 |
| spellingShingle | ULRIKE MÜßIG RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne |
| title | RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION |
| title_full | RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION |
| title_fullStr | RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION |
| title_short | RECONSIDERING CONSTITUTIONAL FORMATION – THE POLISH MAY CONSTITUTION 1791 AS A MASTERPIECE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION |
| title_sort | reconsidering constitutional formation the polish may constitution 1791 as a masterpiece of constitutional communication |
| url | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cph/article/view/4225 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ulrikemußig reconsideringconstitutionalformationthepolishmayconstitution1791asamasterpieceofconstitutionalcommunication |