Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets

Abstract One of the main goals when studying Space Weather is to characterize extreme events occurrences and related characteristics. To do so, dedicated statistical methods from the so‐called extreme value analysis (EVA) field have been developed. In this study we used Ca index, derived from aa, in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Bernoux, V. Maget
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536412916121600
author G. Bernoux
V. Maget
author_facet G. Bernoux
V. Maget
author_sort G. Bernoux
collection DOAJ
description Abstract One of the main goals when studying Space Weather is to characterize extreme events occurrences and related characteristics. To do so, dedicated statistical methods from the so‐called extreme value analysis (EVA) field have been developed. In this study we used Ca index, derived from aa, in order to characterize geoeffectiveness from the radiation belts point of view with a 150‐year‐long data set. The analysis performed in this study thus focuses on this newsworthy index to provide clues on the reliability of EVA methods. The first main result we present here is that the 1‐in‐10‐, 1‐in‐50‐, and 1‐in‐100‐year events, respectively, match Ca values of 100.39, 131.39, and 142.84 nT. Consequently, the only 1‐in‐100 event observed during the Space Era would be the “Halloween Storm” in 2003 that reached a Ca value of 147.6 nT. The second main result highlighted in this work is that performing the same analysis with shorter subsets (20 years long) can give significantly different results for two reasons. The first reason is that some short time periods do not display the same distribution of events as the full period. The second reason is that the choice of the correct threshold (when using a Peaks Over Threshold approach) is made difficult with a short data set and leads to inaccurate results. This is a strong result as for accurate estimation of the induced effects of extreme events in radiation belts, we may only rely on short flux data sets from one or another mission (mostly shorter than 20 years).
format Article
id doaj-art-7caca1b7e2764f4dbb6188569b625a5a
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-7caca1b7e2764f4dbb6188569b625a5a2025-01-14T16:30:43ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902020-06-01186n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002450Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data SetsG. Bernoux0V. Maget1ONERA/DPHY Université de Toulouse Toulouse FranceONERA/DPHY Université de Toulouse Toulouse FranceAbstract One of the main goals when studying Space Weather is to characterize extreme events occurrences and related characteristics. To do so, dedicated statistical methods from the so‐called extreme value analysis (EVA) field have been developed. In this study we used Ca index, derived from aa, in order to characterize geoeffectiveness from the radiation belts point of view with a 150‐year‐long data set. The analysis performed in this study thus focuses on this newsworthy index to provide clues on the reliability of EVA methods. The first main result we present here is that the 1‐in‐10‐, 1‐in‐50‐, and 1‐in‐100‐year events, respectively, match Ca values of 100.39, 131.39, and 142.84 nT. Consequently, the only 1‐in‐100 event observed during the Space Era would be the “Halloween Storm” in 2003 that reached a Ca value of 147.6 nT. The second main result highlighted in this work is that performing the same analysis with shorter subsets (20 years long) can give significantly different results for two reasons. The first reason is that some short time periods do not display the same distribution of events as the full period. The second reason is that the choice of the correct threshold (when using a Peaks Over Threshold approach) is made difficult with a short data set and leads to inaccurate results. This is a strong result as for accurate estimation of the induced effects of extreme events in radiation belts, we may only rely on short flux data sets from one or another mission (mostly shorter than 20 years).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002450Space Weatherextreme value analysisradiation beltsCa indexextreme events
spellingShingle G. Bernoux
V. Maget
Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
Space Weather
Space Weather
extreme value analysis
radiation belts
Ca index
extreme events
title Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
title_full Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
title_fullStr Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
title_short Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data Sets
title_sort characterizing extreme geomagnetic storms using extreme value analysis a discussion on the representativeness of short data sets
topic Space Weather
extreme value analysis
radiation belts
Ca index
extreme events
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002450
work_keys_str_mv AT gbernoux characterizingextremegeomagneticstormsusingextremevalueanalysisadiscussionontherepresentativenessofshortdatasets
AT vmaget characterizingextremegeomagneticstormsusingextremevalueanalysisadiscussionontherepresentativenessofshortdatasets