Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of pressable and milled lithium disilicate crowns, focusing on their shade-matching accuracy against the VITA Classical A1 shade guide. Material and methods: 20 samples each of lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated using pressable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shweta A. Gaikwad, Amit K. Jagtap, V.N.V. Madhav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-11-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825001745
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849404758487465984
author Shweta A. Gaikwad
Amit K. Jagtap
V.N.V. Madhav
author_facet Shweta A. Gaikwad
Amit K. Jagtap
V.N.V. Madhav
author_sort Shweta A. Gaikwad
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of pressable and milled lithium disilicate crowns, focusing on their shade-matching accuracy against the VITA Classical A1 shade guide. Material and methods: 20 samples each of lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated using pressable and CAD/CAM-milled techniques and VITA A1 shade tab as the control. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the optical properties of the crown, namely, brightness (L∗), red-green (a∗), blue-yellow (b∗), and color difference (ΔE) values. Data obtained was analyzed statistically to assess shade-matching precision and optical differences. Results: The lightness (L∗) value of the pressable group (92.22 ± 2.67) was significantly higher than that of the milled group (88.10 ± 1.08) and the control group (87.78 ± 0.08). Regarding the red–green axis (a∗), the pressable group had the highest mean value (0.97 ± 0.37), followed by milled (0.85 ± 0.24) and control (0.35 ± 0.11), showed statistically significant differences. In terms of yellow-blue chroma (b), the pressable crowns recorded the highest value (14.89 ± 0.99), followed by the control (14.43 ± 0.07) and milled (13.56 ± 0.25). Milled crowns exhibited a significantly lower ΔE (1.49 ± 0.42) compared to pressable crowns (4.71 ± 2.55). Conclusion: Milled lithium disilicate crowns showed superior shade-matching accuracy, which exhibited lower color difference (ΔE) values, inferring closer color alignment with the A1 standard. Pressable crowns showed enhanced translucency and esthetic vibrancy as contributed by higher brightness and chromatic intensity, but exhibited greater variability in color matching.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c90717f84474880b0671dfbc094fbcf
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2025-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-7c90717f84474880b0671dfbc094fbcf2025-08-20T03:36:53ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682025-11-011561248125310.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.001Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro studyShweta A. Gaikwad0Amit K. Jagtap1V.N.V. Madhav2Corresponding author. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Implantology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India.; Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Implantology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Implantology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Implantology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, IndiaAim: The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of pressable and milled lithium disilicate crowns, focusing on their shade-matching accuracy against the VITA Classical A1 shade guide. Material and methods: 20 samples each of lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated using pressable and CAD/CAM-milled techniques and VITA A1 shade tab as the control. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the optical properties of the crown, namely, brightness (L∗), red-green (a∗), blue-yellow (b∗), and color difference (ΔE) values. Data obtained was analyzed statistically to assess shade-matching precision and optical differences. Results: The lightness (L∗) value of the pressable group (92.22 ± 2.67) was significantly higher than that of the milled group (88.10 ± 1.08) and the control group (87.78 ± 0.08). Regarding the red–green axis (a∗), the pressable group had the highest mean value (0.97 ± 0.37), followed by milled (0.85 ± 0.24) and control (0.35 ± 0.11), showed statistically significant differences. In terms of yellow-blue chroma (b), the pressable crowns recorded the highest value (14.89 ± 0.99), followed by the control (14.43 ± 0.07) and milled (13.56 ± 0.25). Milled crowns exhibited a significantly lower ΔE (1.49 ± 0.42) compared to pressable crowns (4.71 ± 2.55). Conclusion: Milled lithium disilicate crowns showed superior shade-matching accuracy, which exhibited lower color difference (ΔE) values, inferring closer color alignment with the A1 standard. Pressable crowns showed enhanced translucency and esthetic vibrancy as contributed by higher brightness and chromatic intensity, but exhibited greater variability in color matching.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825001745Lithium disilicate crownsPressable ceramicsOptical propertiesColor differenceShade matching
spellingShingle Shweta A. Gaikwad
Amit K. Jagtap
V.N.V. Madhav
Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Lithium disilicate crowns
Pressable ceramics
Optical properties
Color difference
Shade matching
title Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and CAD CAM methods – An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of optical properties of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by pressable and cad cam methods an in vitro study
topic Lithium disilicate crowns
Pressable ceramics
Optical properties
Color difference
Shade matching
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825001745
work_keys_str_mv AT shwetaagaikwad comparativeevaluationofopticalpropertiesoflithiumdisilicatecrownsfabricatedbypressableandcadcammethodsaninvitrostudy
AT amitkjagtap comparativeevaluationofopticalpropertiesoflithiumdisilicatecrownsfabricatedbypressableandcadcammethodsaninvitrostudy
AT vnvmadhav comparativeevaluationofopticalpropertiesoflithiumdisilicatecrownsfabricatedbypressableandcadcammethodsaninvitrostudy