Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.

Negative foot speed (i.e., the speed of the backward and downward motion of the foot relative to the body at ground contact) is a strong predictor of sprinting performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are becoming a popular approach for assessing sports performance. The primary aim of this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerard Aristizábal Pla, Douglas N Martini, Michael V Potter, Wouter Hoogkamer, Stephen M Cain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303920
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850081498144702464
author Gerard Aristizábal Pla
Douglas N Martini
Michael V Potter
Wouter Hoogkamer
Stephen M Cain
author_facet Gerard Aristizábal Pla
Douglas N Martini
Michael V Potter
Wouter Hoogkamer
Stephen M Cain
author_sort Gerard Aristizábal Pla
collection DOAJ
description Negative foot speed (i.e., the speed of the backward and downward motion of the foot relative to the body at ground contact) is a strong predictor of sprinting performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are becoming a popular approach for assessing sports performance. The primary aim of this study was to use IMUs to investigate the relationship between negative foot speed and top running speed attained during a sprint on an outdoor track. The secondary aim of this study was to use IMUs to investigate the relationship between initial contact foot velocity and running speed on a stride-by-stride basis for a sprint on an outdoor track. Seventeen participants performed 80-meter track sprints while wearing a shoe-mounted IMU. The anteroposterior component, vertical component, and magnitude of the velocity of the foot at initial contact was extracted from the IMU for each stride. For the mean peak stride speed of 7.98±0.78m/s and average stride speed of 7.43±0.68m/s, the adjusted R2 values were 0.27 and 0.69, 0.42 and 0.64, and 0.42 and 0.75 versus the anteroposterior, vertical, and magnitude of initial contact foot velocity, respectively. In conclusion, our findings support the common coaching tip of increasing negative foot speed to improve sprint speed. In addition, the results of this study support the use of IMUs for quantifying sprinting technique with actionable metrics.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c834cb00ef04daaa51837590507b1b2
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-7c834cb00ef04daaa51837590507b1b22025-08-20T02:44:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e030392010.1371/journal.pone.0303920Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.Gerard Aristizábal PlaDouglas N MartiniMichael V PotterWouter HoogkamerStephen M CainNegative foot speed (i.e., the speed of the backward and downward motion of the foot relative to the body at ground contact) is a strong predictor of sprinting performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are becoming a popular approach for assessing sports performance. The primary aim of this study was to use IMUs to investigate the relationship between negative foot speed and top running speed attained during a sprint on an outdoor track. The secondary aim of this study was to use IMUs to investigate the relationship between initial contact foot velocity and running speed on a stride-by-stride basis for a sprint on an outdoor track. Seventeen participants performed 80-meter track sprints while wearing a shoe-mounted IMU. The anteroposterior component, vertical component, and magnitude of the velocity of the foot at initial contact was extracted from the IMU for each stride. For the mean peak stride speed of 7.98±0.78m/s and average stride speed of 7.43±0.68m/s, the adjusted R2 values were 0.27 and 0.69, 0.42 and 0.64, and 0.42 and 0.75 versus the anteroposterior, vertical, and magnitude of initial contact foot velocity, respectively. In conclusion, our findings support the common coaching tip of increasing negative foot speed to improve sprint speed. In addition, the results of this study support the use of IMUs for quantifying sprinting technique with actionable metrics.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303920
spellingShingle Gerard Aristizábal Pla
Douglas N Martini
Michael V Potter
Wouter Hoogkamer
Stephen M Cain
Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
PLoS ONE
title Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
title_full Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
title_fullStr Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
title_short Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.
title_sort evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe mounted inertial sensors
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303920
work_keys_str_mv AT gerardaristizabalpla evaluatingtherelationshipbetweennegativefootspeedandsprintperformanceusingshoemountedinertialsensors
AT douglasnmartini evaluatingtherelationshipbetweennegativefootspeedandsprintperformanceusingshoemountedinertialsensors
AT michaelvpotter evaluatingtherelationshipbetweennegativefootspeedandsprintperformanceusingshoemountedinertialsensors
AT wouterhoogkamer evaluatingtherelationshipbetweennegativefootspeedandsprintperformanceusingshoemountedinertialsensors
AT stephenmcain evaluatingtherelationshipbetweennegativefootspeedandsprintperformanceusingshoemountedinertialsensors