Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness

Abstract Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June–August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one’s tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vacc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia G. Halilova, Samuel Fynes‑Clinton, Caitlin M. Terao, Donna Rose Addis, R. Shayna Rosenbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:Cognitive Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586137095372800
author Julia G. Halilova
Samuel Fynes‑Clinton
Caitlin M. Terao
Donna Rose Addis
R. Shayna Rosenbaum
author_facet Julia G. Halilova
Samuel Fynes‑Clinton
Caitlin M. Terao
Donna Rose Addis
R. Shayna Rosenbaum
author_sort Julia G. Halilova
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June–August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one’s tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vaccination status, demographics, and distress level. Participants who reported being vaccinated were invited back one year later (n = 2547) to report their willingness to receive a booster dose, along with reasons for their decision. After controlling for demographic variables and distress level, a greater tendency to discount future rewards was associated with reduced willingness to receive a booster dose. Thematic coding revealed that the most common reason for booster willingness was protection against COVID-19, and for unwillingness was non-necessity. The results identify delay discounting as a behavioral predictor of booster willingness that may be used to inform tailored approaches to increase booster uptake (e.g., trust in science vs. vaccine mandates).
format Article
id doaj-art-7c80783b126347c8b73a1123ff456b48
institution Kabale University
issn 2365-7464
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Cognitive Research
spelling doaj-art-7c80783b126347c8b73a1123ff456b482025-01-26T12:10:14ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642025-01-0110111010.1186/s41235-024-00609-yDelay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingnessJulia G. Halilova0Samuel Fynes‑Clinton1Caitlin M. Terao2Donna Rose Addis3R. Shayna Rosenbaum4Department of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York UniversityBaycrest Academy for Research and EducationDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York UniversityBaycrest Academy for Research and EducationDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York UniversityAbstract Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June–August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one’s tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vaccination status, demographics, and distress level. Participants who reported being vaccinated were invited back one year later (n = 2547) to report their willingness to receive a booster dose, along with reasons for their decision. After controlling for demographic variables and distress level, a greater tendency to discount future rewards was associated with reduced willingness to receive a booster dose. Thematic coding revealed that the most common reason for booster willingness was protection against COVID-19, and for unwillingness was non-necessity. The results identify delay discounting as a behavioral predictor of booster willingness that may be used to inform tailored approaches to increase booster uptake (e.g., trust in science vs. vaccine mandates).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00609-yDecision-makingPublic health measuresVaccine hesitancyImmunity maintenance
spellingShingle Julia G. Halilova
Samuel Fynes‑Clinton
Caitlin M. Terao
Donna Rose Addis
R. Shayna Rosenbaum
Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
Cognitive Research
Decision-making
Public health measures
Vaccine hesitancy
Immunity maintenance
title Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
title_full Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
title_fullStr Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
title_full_unstemmed Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
title_short Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness
title_sort delay discounting predicts covid 19 vaccine booster willingness
topic Decision-making
Public health measures
Vaccine hesitancy
Immunity maintenance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y
work_keys_str_mv AT juliaghalilova delaydiscountingpredictscovid19vaccineboosterwillingness
AT samuelfynesclinton delaydiscountingpredictscovid19vaccineboosterwillingness
AT caitlinmterao delaydiscountingpredictscovid19vaccineboosterwillingness
AT donnaroseaddis delaydiscountingpredictscovid19vaccineboosterwillingness
AT rshaynarosenbaum delaydiscountingpredictscovid19vaccineboosterwillingness