Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies

The growing focus on operational energy efficiency in the building sector has revealed a critical gap in addressing embodied impacts—carbon emissions and energy demands associated with the production, construction, use, and end-of-life stages of buildings. This research addresses this gap by introdu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsvetelina Spasova Bacheva, Javier F. Raposo Grau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/10/1661
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850127385216679936
author Tsvetelina Spasova Bacheva
Javier F. Raposo Grau
author_facet Tsvetelina Spasova Bacheva
Javier F. Raposo Grau
author_sort Tsvetelina Spasova Bacheva
collection DOAJ
description The growing focus on operational energy efficiency in the building sector has revealed a critical gap in addressing embodied impacts—carbon emissions and energy demands associated with the production, construction, use, and end-of-life stages of buildings. This research addresses this gap by introducing an integrated framework encouraging collaboration across academia, industry, and policymakers. Based on a systematic analysis of current research, the study identifies trends and provides actionable recommendations to enhance embodied impacts assessments. The findings reveal limited representation in key areas like Building Information Modeling (BIM) and policy frameworks, alongside a strong geographical imbalance in research, with 60% of the investigations originating from only five countries. Life cycle stages beyond “cradle-to-gate” remain marginally explored, with only 39% concerning end-of-life or reuse phases. Moreover, 65% of stakeholder engagement is confined to LCA specialists and building designers, highlighting the need for broader participation. This study proposes a comprehensive framework promoting a holistic approach to embodied impacts, advocating their integration into academic curricula and urging industry professionals to adopt collaborative and sustainable practices. By clarifying sectoral gaps and outlining targeted pathways for integration, this study provides a foundation for translating embodied impact research into practical application and regulatory frameworks.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c21a2b3a655417b974df6a61fb8a0ed
institution OA Journals
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-7c21a2b3a655417b974df6a61fb8a0ed2025-08-20T02:33:42ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-05-011510166110.3390/buildings15101661Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration StrategiesTsvetelina Spasova Bacheva0Javier F. Raposo Grau1Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainThe growing focus on operational energy efficiency in the building sector has revealed a critical gap in addressing embodied impacts—carbon emissions and energy demands associated with the production, construction, use, and end-of-life stages of buildings. This research addresses this gap by introducing an integrated framework encouraging collaboration across academia, industry, and policymakers. Based on a systematic analysis of current research, the study identifies trends and provides actionable recommendations to enhance embodied impacts assessments. The findings reveal limited representation in key areas like Building Information Modeling (BIM) and policy frameworks, alongside a strong geographical imbalance in research, with 60% of the investigations originating from only five countries. Life cycle stages beyond “cradle-to-gate” remain marginally explored, with only 39% concerning end-of-life or reuse phases. Moreover, 65% of stakeholder engagement is confined to LCA specialists and building designers, highlighting the need for broader participation. This study proposes a comprehensive framework promoting a holistic approach to embodied impacts, advocating their integration into academic curricula and urging industry professionals to adopt collaborative and sustainable practices. By clarifying sectoral gaps and outlining targeted pathways for integration, this study provides a foundation for translating embodied impact research into practical application and regulatory frameworks.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/10/1661embodied energyembodied carbonlife cycle analysisbuilding information modeling (BIM)AECO stakeholderssystematic literature review
spellingShingle Tsvetelina Spasova Bacheva
Javier F. Raposo Grau
Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
Buildings
embodied energy
embodied carbon
life cycle analysis
building information modeling (BIM)
AECO stakeholders
systematic literature review
title Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
title_full Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
title_fullStr Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
title_short Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies
title_sort embodied impacts in buildings a systematic review of life cycle gaps and sectoral integration strategies
topic embodied energy
embodied carbon
life cycle analysis
building information modeling (BIM)
AECO stakeholders
systematic literature review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/10/1661
work_keys_str_mv AT tsvetelinaspasovabacheva embodiedimpactsinbuildingsasystematicreviewoflifecyclegapsandsectoralintegrationstrategies
AT javierfraposograu embodiedimpactsinbuildingsasystematicreviewoflifecyclegapsandsectoralintegrationstrategies