Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea

The Paris Agreement emphasizes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from coal power. One suggested approach is repowering coal-fired power plants (CPPs) with small modular reactors (SMRs). South Korea plans to retire CPPs in the coming decades and requires alternative options fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Semin Joo, Seok Ho Song, Seokjun Oh, Staffan Qvist, Jeong Ik Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6493
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850041125747818496
author Semin Joo
Seok Ho Song
Seokjun Oh
Staffan Qvist
Jeong Ik Lee
author_facet Semin Joo
Seok Ho Song
Seokjun Oh
Staffan Qvist
Jeong Ik Lee
author_sort Semin Joo
collection DOAJ
description The Paris Agreement emphasizes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from coal power. One suggested approach is repowering coal-fired power plants (CPPs) with small modular reactors (SMRs). South Korea plans to retire CPPs in the coming decades and requires alternative options for coal-fired energy. This study presents a scoping analysis comparing variable renewable energy (VRE) sources with SMRs for repowering CPPs in the Korean context. The analysis indicates that SMRs may be a more favorable option than VRE sources, particularly due to their load-following capabilities. In this study, two types of SMRs were investigated: high-temperature gas reactors (HTGRs) and pressurized water reactors (PWRs). HTGRs are suitable to fit the high-temperature operating conditions of steam turbines but require multiple units due to their low volumetric flow rates. PWRs, while matching the volumetric flow rate of existing CPP turbines, require additional thermal energy sources to meet the high-temperature operating conditions of steam turbines. Lastly, an analysis of necessary regulatory and legislative changes in South Korea’s nuclear framework is presented, identifying several key regulatory issues for repowering coal with nuclear energy.
format Article
id doaj-art-7bdfcf00c4ac4651a7fc471fa031ce5d
institution DOAJ
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-7bdfcf00c4ac4651a7fc471fa031ce5d2025-08-20T02:55:52ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732024-12-011724649310.3390/en17246493Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South KoreaSemin Joo0Seok Ho Song1Seokjun Oh2Staffan Qvist3Jeong Ik Lee4Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of KoreaQvist Consulting Limited, Middlesex, Southall UB1 3EP, UKDepartment of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of KoreaThe Paris Agreement emphasizes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from coal power. One suggested approach is repowering coal-fired power plants (CPPs) with small modular reactors (SMRs). South Korea plans to retire CPPs in the coming decades and requires alternative options for coal-fired energy. This study presents a scoping analysis comparing variable renewable energy (VRE) sources with SMRs for repowering CPPs in the Korean context. The analysis indicates that SMRs may be a more favorable option than VRE sources, particularly due to their load-following capabilities. In this study, two types of SMRs were investigated: high-temperature gas reactors (HTGRs) and pressurized water reactors (PWRs). HTGRs are suitable to fit the high-temperature operating conditions of steam turbines but require multiple units due to their low volumetric flow rates. PWRs, while matching the volumetric flow rate of existing CPP turbines, require additional thermal energy sources to meet the high-temperature operating conditions of steam turbines. Lastly, an analysis of necessary regulatory and legislative changes in South Korea’s nuclear framework is presented, identifying several key regulatory issues for repowering coal with nuclear energy.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6493small modular reactorcoal repoweringrenewable energyregulatory system of nuclear power plant
spellingShingle Semin Joo
Seok Ho Song
Seokjun Oh
Staffan Qvist
Jeong Ik Lee
Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
Energies
small modular reactor
coal repowering
renewable energy
regulatory system of nuclear power plant
title Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
title_full Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
title_fullStr Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
title_short Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea
title_sort evaluation of coal repowering option with small modular reactor in south korea
topic small modular reactor
coal repowering
renewable energy
regulatory system of nuclear power plant
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6493
work_keys_str_mv AT seminjoo evaluationofcoalrepoweringoptionwithsmallmodularreactorinsouthkorea
AT seokhosong evaluationofcoalrepoweringoptionwithsmallmodularreactorinsouthkorea
AT seokjunoh evaluationofcoalrepoweringoptionwithsmallmodularreactorinsouthkorea
AT staffanqvist evaluationofcoalrepoweringoptionwithsmallmodularreactorinsouthkorea
AT jeongiklee evaluationofcoalrepoweringoptionwithsmallmodularreactorinsouthkorea