Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study

Abstract Objectives To determine the optimal dexmedetomidine dose for hemodynamic stability and recovery quality in modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT). Methods In this randomized trial, 252 patients receiving MECT were allocated to six groups (placebo, D1–D5; 42/group). Groups D1–D5 received...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Shen, Min Zhou, Guangliang Zhu, Yu Zhang, Jinzhi Ma, Dekui Li, Lei Chen, Kejun Qi, Anjiang Wang, Yang Jiang, Zhiming Dai, Xiaoming Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02509-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850268700859432960
author Jun Shen
Min Zhou
Guangliang Zhu
Yu Zhang
Jinzhi Ma
Dekui Li
Lei Chen
Kejun Qi
Anjiang Wang
Yang Jiang
Zhiming Dai
Xiaoming Li
author_facet Jun Shen
Min Zhou
Guangliang Zhu
Yu Zhang
Jinzhi Ma
Dekui Li
Lei Chen
Kejun Qi
Anjiang Wang
Yang Jiang
Zhiming Dai
Xiaoming Li
author_sort Jun Shen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To determine the optimal dexmedetomidine dose for hemodynamic stability and recovery quality in modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT). Methods In this randomized trial, 252 patients receiving MECT were allocated to six groups (placebo, D1–D5; 42/group). Groups D1–D5 received dexmedetomidine (0.2–1.0 μg/kg) 10 min pre-anesthesia, while controls received saline. Hemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), seizure duration, propofol requirements, recovery times, and adverse events were analyzed. Results Doses ≥ 0.4 μg/kg (D2–D5) significantly reduced HR and MAP versus control (P < 0.05), with prolonged recovery in D4–D5 (P < 0.05). Seizure duration remained unchanged across groups. Propofol use decreased dose-dependently (D2–D5, P < 0.05). The D2 group (0.4 μg/kg) achieved optimal hemodynamic stability without excessive recovery delays. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine pretreatment at 0.4 μg/kg optimizes MECT anesthesia by balancing hemodynamic control, reduced propofol use, and rapid recovery, establishing it as the recommended dose.
format Article
id doaj-art-7bdfb31cfba740e78d4754fe74a8ff84
institution OA Journals
issn 2047-783X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-7bdfb31cfba740e78d4754fe74a8ff842025-08-20T01:53:23ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2025-04-013011710.1186/s40001-025-02509-3Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment studyJun Shen0Min Zhou1Guangliang Zhu2Yu Zhang3Jinzhi Ma4Dekui Li5Lei Chen6Kejun Qi7Anjiang Wang8Yang Jiang9Zhiming Dai10Xiaoming Li11Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeDepartment of Psychiatry, Lu’an Mental Health CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Lu’an Mental Health CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Lu’an Mental Health CenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Lu’an Mental Health CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People’s Hospital of XianyangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational CollegeAbstract Objectives To determine the optimal dexmedetomidine dose for hemodynamic stability and recovery quality in modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT). Methods In this randomized trial, 252 patients receiving MECT were allocated to six groups (placebo, D1–D5; 42/group). Groups D1–D5 received dexmedetomidine (0.2–1.0 μg/kg) 10 min pre-anesthesia, while controls received saline. Hemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), seizure duration, propofol requirements, recovery times, and adverse events were analyzed. Results Doses ≥ 0.4 μg/kg (D2–D5) significantly reduced HR and MAP versus control (P < 0.05), with prolonged recovery in D4–D5 (P < 0.05). Seizure duration remained unchanged across groups. Propofol use decreased dose-dependently (D2–D5, P < 0.05). The D2 group (0.4 μg/kg) achieved optimal hemodynamic stability without excessive recovery delays. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine pretreatment at 0.4 μg/kg optimizes MECT anesthesia by balancing hemodynamic control, reduced propofol use, and rapid recovery, establishing it as the recommended dose.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02509-3DexmedetomidineModified electroconvulsive therapyAnesthesiaPreconditioningOptimal dose
spellingShingle Jun Shen
Min Zhou
Guangliang Zhu
Yu Zhang
Jinzhi Ma
Dekui Li
Lei Chen
Kejun Qi
Anjiang Wang
Yang Jiang
Zhiming Dai
Xiaoming Li
Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
European Journal of Medical Research
Dexmedetomidine
Modified electroconvulsive therapy
Anesthesia
Preconditioning
Optimal dose
title Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
title_full Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
title_fullStr Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
title_full_unstemmed Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
title_short Dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy: a dose-optimized treatment study
title_sort dexmedetomidine for modified electroconvulsive therapy a dose optimized treatment study
topic Dexmedetomidine
Modified electroconvulsive therapy
Anesthesia
Preconditioning
Optimal dose
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02509-3
work_keys_str_mv AT junshen dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT minzhou dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT guangliangzhu dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT yuzhang dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT jinzhima dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT dekuili dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT leichen dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT kejunqi dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT anjiangwang dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT yangjiang dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT zhimingdai dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy
AT xiaomingli dexmedetomidineformodifiedelectroconvulsivetherapyadoseoptimizedtreatmentstudy