Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights

This work focuses primarily on animal rights in the United States within the context of the specific legal system existing in that country. It argues that animal rights as recognized by state law are limited, in the sense that enforcement can occur only through public prosecution. If horses and cow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enyimba Maduka, Chukwuemeka I. Awugosi, Pius A. Ohere, Timothy Adie Okpe, Joseph Paul Essien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2024-12-01
Series:Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/14301
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542899498123264
author Enyimba Maduka
Chukwuemeka I. Awugosi
Pius A. Ohere
Timothy Adie Okpe
Joseph Paul Essien
author_facet Enyimba Maduka
Chukwuemeka I. Awugosi
Pius A. Ohere
Timothy Adie Okpe
Joseph Paul Essien
author_sort Enyimba Maduka
collection DOAJ
description This work focuses primarily on animal rights in the United States within the context of the specific legal system existing in that country. It argues that animal rights as recognized by state law are limited, in the sense that enforcement can occur only through public prosecution. If horses and cows are beaten and mistreated at a local farm, or if greyhounds are forced to live in small cages, protection will come only if the prosecutor decides to provide it. However, as prosecutors have limited budgets, and animal protection is rarely a priority the result is that violations of state law occur every day. We contend that there is no good reason to accept the level of suffering that is now being experienced by millions of living creatures. Doubts have been raised about the radical idea that animals deserve to have “autonomy”, understood as a right to be free from human control and use. In our view, the primary focus should instead be on animal welfare and suffering. While animals should not be treated merely as tools for human purposes, it is possible for humans to control them in ways that still allow animals to have decent lives. However, emphasis on minimizing suffering and ensuring decent lives for animals has significant implications. It is appropriate to consider human interests in this equation, because most times human interests take precedence over those of animals. Adopting the conversational method of inquiry, we claim that often the interests of animals are entirely disregarded, and if they were considered, many of our current practices would be indefensible.
format Article
id doaj-art-7b9760410d7240c48065f8cb6424452f
institution Kabale University
issn 1733-1218
2719-826X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
spelling doaj-art-7b9760410d7240c48065f8cb6424452f2025-02-03T14:21:56ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182719-826X2024-12-0123110.21697/seb.5832Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal RightsEnyimba Maduka0Chukwuemeka I. Awugosi1Pius A. Ohere2Timothy Adie Okpe 3Joseph Paul Essien4University of Calabar, University of Calabar, University of Calabar, University of Calabar, University of Calabar, This work focuses primarily on animal rights in the United States within the context of the specific legal system existing in that country. It argues that animal rights as recognized by state law are limited, in the sense that enforcement can occur only through public prosecution. If horses and cows are beaten and mistreated at a local farm, or if greyhounds are forced to live in small cages, protection will come only if the prosecutor decides to provide it. However, as prosecutors have limited budgets, and animal protection is rarely a priority the result is that violations of state law occur every day. We contend that there is no good reason to accept the level of suffering that is now being experienced by millions of living creatures. Doubts have been raised about the radical idea that animals deserve to have “autonomy”, understood as a right to be free from human control and use. In our view, the primary focus should instead be on animal welfare and suffering. While animals should not be treated merely as tools for human purposes, it is possible for humans to control them in ways that still allow animals to have decent lives. However, emphasis on minimizing suffering and ensuring decent lives for animals has significant implications. It is appropriate to consider human interests in this equation, because most times human interests take precedence over those of animals. Adopting the conversational method of inquiry, we claim that often the interests of animals are entirely disregarded, and if they were considered, many of our current practices would be indefensible. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/14301animal rightsanimal welfareanimal ethicsTom Reganmeat consumption
spellingShingle Enyimba Maduka
Chukwuemeka I. Awugosi
Pius A. Ohere
Timothy Adie Okpe
Joseph Paul Essien
Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
animal rights
animal welfare
animal ethics
Tom Regan
meat consumption
title Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
title_full Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
title_fullStr Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
title_full_unstemmed Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
title_short Discussion of Inconsiderate Cruelty Towards Animals: Further Arguments for Animal Rights
title_sort discussion of inconsiderate cruelty towards animals further arguments for animal rights
topic animal rights
animal welfare
animal ethics
Tom Regan
meat consumption
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/14301
work_keys_str_mv AT enyimbamaduka discussionofinconsideratecrueltytowardsanimalsfurtherargumentsforanimalrights
AT chukwuemekaiawugosi discussionofinconsideratecrueltytowardsanimalsfurtherargumentsforanimalrights
AT piusaohere discussionofinconsideratecrueltytowardsanimalsfurtherargumentsforanimalrights
AT timothyadieokpe discussionofinconsideratecrueltytowardsanimalsfurtherargumentsforanimalrights
AT josephpaulessien discussionofinconsideratecrueltytowardsanimalsfurtherargumentsforanimalrights