Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study
The accuracy of intraoral scanners in scanning dental implants in different clinical situations was verified. Models simulating single rehabilitation, multiple fixed partial dentures and protocol were scanned with each scanner by a single trained operator (n=10): iTero (Align Technology), Trios (3Sh...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Chilean Society of Periodontology
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849400478042947584 |
|---|---|
| author | Briza Letícia Almeida-Silva Sérgio Candido-Dias Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho Aline Batista Gonçalves-Franco Kelly Maria Silva-Moreira Elimario Venturin-Ramos |
| author_facet | Briza Letícia Almeida-Silva Sérgio Candido-Dias Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho Aline Batista Gonçalves-Franco Kelly Maria Silva-Moreira Elimario Venturin-Ramos |
| author_sort | Briza Letícia Almeida-Silva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The accuracy of intraoral scanners in scanning dental implants in different clinical situations was verified. Models simulating single rehabilitation, multiple fixed partial dentures and protocol were scanned with each scanner by a single trained operator (n=10): iTero (Align Technology), Trios (3Shape), CEREC Primescan (Dentsply Sirona) and Ceramill 400 laboratory scanner (Amann Girrbach), as a control group. The engineering software R everse (Geomagic) was used for the analysis of the files obtained and SPSS for the statistics (p≤0.05). In single-prosthesis rehabilitation, there was no difference between the intraoral scannersiTero, Trios and CEREC Primescan intraoral scanners. In the multiple fixed partial dentures, the Trios and CEREC Primescan scanners showed significantly smaller discrepancies than those found with the iTero, only the CEREC Primescan intraoral scanner did not differ significantly from the benchtop scanner. Simulating protocol-type prosthesis, in any region, all intraoral scanners resulted in significantly less accurate measurements than the benchtop scanner. Exceptions were found when the CEREC Primescan scanner was used in the regions of elements 13-23, 16-26 and 16-13, situations in which there was no significant difference in relation to the benchtop scanner. Therefore, different intraoral scanners and clinical situations can influence the accuracy of dental implant scanning. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7b3368f2e6974e4ca13146dd0e57c2d3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2452-5588 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Chilean Society of Periodontology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-7b3368f2e6974e4ca13146dd0e57c2d32025-08-20T03:38:02ZengChilean Society of PeriodontologyInternational Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry2452-55882025-04-01181101310.4067/s2452-55882025000100010Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy studyBriza Letícia Almeida-Silva0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-7181Sérgio Candido-Dias1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-2167Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6279-3558Aline Batista Gonçalves-Franco3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-0459Kelly Maria Silva-Moreira4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-3908Elimario Venturin-Ramos5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-4093Faculdade São Leopoldo MandicFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicThe accuracy of intraoral scanners in scanning dental implants in different clinical situations was verified. Models simulating single rehabilitation, multiple fixed partial dentures and protocol were scanned with each scanner by a single trained operator (n=10): iTero (Align Technology), Trios (3Shape), CEREC Primescan (Dentsply Sirona) and Ceramill 400 laboratory scanner (Amann Girrbach), as a control group. The engineering software R everse (Geomagic) was used for the analysis of the files obtained and SPSS for the statistics (p≤0.05). In single-prosthesis rehabilitation, there was no difference between the intraoral scannersiTero, Trios and CEREC Primescan intraoral scanners. In the multiple fixed partial dentures, the Trios and CEREC Primescan scanners showed significantly smaller discrepancies than those found with the iTero, only the CEREC Primescan intraoral scanner did not differ significantly from the benchtop scanner. Simulating protocol-type prosthesis, in any region, all intraoral scanners resulted in significantly less accurate measurements than the benchtop scanner. Exceptions were found when the CEREC Primescan scanner was used in the regions of elements 13-23, 16-26 and 16-13, situations in which there was no significant difference in relation to the benchtop scanner. Therefore, different intraoral scanners and clinical situations can influence the accuracy of dental implant scanning.dental implantsdigital dentistryscannerscanbody |
| spellingShingle | Briza Letícia Almeida-Silva Sérgio Candido-Dias Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho Aline Batista Gonçalves-Franco Kelly Maria Silva-Moreira Elimario Venturin-Ramos Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study International Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry dental implants digital dentistry scanner scanbody |
| title | Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study |
| title_full | Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study |
| title_fullStr | Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study |
| title_short | Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: Accuracy study |
| title_sort | analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners accuracy study |
| topic | dental implants digital dentistry scanner scanbody |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brizaleticiaalmeidasilva analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy AT sergiocandidodias analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy AT geraldoalbertopinheirodecarvalho analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy AT alinebatistagoncalvesfranco analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy AT kellymariasilvamoreira analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy AT elimarioventurinramos analysisofthescanningperformanceofdentalimplantsusingdifferentintraoralscannersaccuracystudy |